Knockoffs-SPR: Clean Sample Selection in Learning with Noisy Labels
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A noisy training set usually leads to the degradation of the generalization and robustness of neural networks. In this paper, we propose a novel theoretically guaranteed clean sample selection framework for learning with noisy labels. Specifically, we first present a Scalable Penalized Regression (SPR) method, to model the linear relation between network features and one-hot labels. In SPR, the clean data are identified by the zero mean-shift parameters solved in the regression model. We theoretically show that SPR can recover clean data under some conditions. Under general scenarios, the conditions may be no longer satisfied; and some noisy data are falsely selected as clean data. To solve this problem, we propose a data-adaptive method for Scalable Penalized Regression with Knockoff filters (Knockoffs-SPR), which is provable to control the False-Selection-Rate (FSR) in the selected clean data. To improve the efficiency, we further present a split algorithm that divides the whole training set into small pieces that can be solved in parallel to make the framework scalable to large datasets. While Knockoffs-SPR can be regarded as a sample selection module for a standard supervised training pipeline, we further combine it with a semi-supervised algorithm to exploit the support of noisy data as unlabeled data. Experimental results on several benchmark datasets and real-world noisy datasets show the effectiveness of our framework and validate the theoretical results of Knockoffs-SPR. Our code and pre-trained models are available at https://github.com/Yikai-Wang/Knockoffs-SPR.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 49 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jan 2023.
Builds on
49 of 81 references.
References · 49
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
- 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,853
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
- 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,509
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
- 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
- 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
- 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 670
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
- 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
37 more
- 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 499
- 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 441
- 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
- 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 327
- 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
- 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
- 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
- 2017Decoupling "when to update" from "how to update"cited by 230
- 2019Probabilistic End-to-end Noise Correction for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 210
- 2019Understanding and Utilizing Deep Neural Networks Trained with Noisy Labelscited by 209
- 2018Dimensionality-Driven Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 173
- 2019SELF: Learning to Filter Noisy Labels with Self-Ensemblingcited by 164
- 2017Learning from Noisy Labels with Distillationcited by 160
- 2018Learning to Learn from Noisy Labeled Datacited by 160
- 2019Learning From Noisy Labels By Regularized Estimation Of Annotator Confusioncited by 126
- 2016Panning for Gold: Model-X Knockoffs for High-dimensional Controlled Variable Selectioncited by 120
- 2017Learning From Noisy Large-Scale Datasets With Minimal Supervisioncited by 115
- 2018Iterative Learning with Open-set Noisy Labelscited by 108
- 2014Controlling the false discovery rate via knockoffscited by 97
- 2015Webly Supervised Learning of Convolutional Networkscited by 95
- 2018Masking: A New Perspective of Noisy Supervisioncited by 93
- 2019Curriculum Loss: Robust Learning and Generalization against Label Corruptioncited by 87
- 2019Combating Label Noise in Deep Learning Using Abstentioncited by 86
- 2017Toward Robustness against Label Noise in Training Deep Discriminative Neural Networkscited by 78
- 2020A Topological Filter for Learning with Label Noisecited by 76
- 2019Robust Inference via Generative Classifiers for Handling Noisy Labelscited by 67
- 2020Instance Credibility Inference for Few-Shot Learningcited by 57
- 2021Learning with Noisy Labels via Sparse Regularizationcited by 38
- 2016A knockoff filter for high-dimensional selective inferencecited by 25
- 2020How to trust unlabeled data? Instance Credibility Inference for Few-Shot Learningcited by 16
- 2022Scalable Penalized Regression for Noise Detection in Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 15
- 2015Robust Subjective Visual Property Prediction from Crowdsourced Pairwise Labelscited by 12
- 2016The knockoff filter for FDR control in group-sparse and multitask regressioncited by 11
- 2013A Blockwise Descent Algorithm for Group-penalized Multiresponse and Multinomial Regressioncited by 8
- 2019Scalable Bayesian Preference Learning for Crowdscited by 6
- 2016False Discovery Rate Control and Statistical Quality Assessment of Annotators in Crowdsourced Rankingcited by 3
- 2021Controlling the False Discovery Rate in Transformational Sparsity: Split Knockoffscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.