mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AER: Auto-Encoder with Regression for Time Series Anomaly Detection

arXiv 2212.13558 ↗First posted 27 Dec 2022cs.LG stat.MLcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Anomaly detection on time series data is increasingly common across various industrial domains that monitor metrics in order to prevent potential accidents and economic losses. However, a scarcity of labeled data and ambiguous definitions of anomalies can complicate these efforts. Recent unsupervised machine learning methods have made remarkable progress in tackling this problem using either single-timestamp predictions or time series reconstructions. While traditionally considered separately, these methods are not mutually exclusive and can offer complementary perspectives on anomaly detection. This paper first highlights the successes and limitations of prediction-based and reconstruction-based methods with visualized time series signals and anomaly scores. We then propose AER (Auto-encoder with Regression), a joint model that combines a vanilla auto-encoder and an LSTM regressor to incorporate the successes and address the limitations of each method. Our model can produce bi-directional predictions while simultaneously reconstructing the original time series by optimizing a joint objective function. Furthermore, we propose several ways of combining the prediction and reconstruction errors through a series of ablation studies. Finally, we compare the performance of the AER architecture against two prediction-based methods and three reconstruction-based methods on 12 well-known univariate time series datasets from NASA, Yahoo, Numenta, and UCR. The results show that AER has the highest averaged F1 score across all datasets (a 23.5% improvement compared to ARIMA) while retaining a runtime similar to its vanilla auto-encoder and regressor components. Our model is available in Orion, an open-source benchmarking tool for time series anomaly detection.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Dec 2022.

Builds on

11 of 23 references.

References · 11

  1. 2018Detecting Spacecraft Anomalies Using LSTMs and Nonparametric Dynamic Thresholdingcited by 407
  2. 2019Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Surveycited by 357
  3. 2017A Multimodal Anomaly Detector for Robot-Assisted Feeding Using an LSTM-based Variational Autoencodercited by 209
  4. 2019MAD-GAN: Multivariate Anomaly Detection for Time Series Data with Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 176
  5. 2020Multivariate Time-series Anomaly Detection via Graph Attention Networkcited by 165
  6. 2019Time-Series Anomaly Detection Service at Microsoftcited by 163
  7. 2020Current Time Series Anomaly Detection Benchmarks are Flawed and are Creating the Illusion of Progresscited by 148
  8. 2018Interactive Supercomputing on 40,000 Cores for Machine Learning and Data Analysiscited by 110
  9. 2020TadGAN: Time Series Anomaly Detection Using Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 55
  10. 2022Sintel: A Machine Learning Framework to Extract Insights from Signalscited by 16
  11. 2021VBridge: Connecting the Dots Between Features and Data to Explain Healthcare Modelscited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 4.

8 papers.