mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Assessment of Transformer-Based Encoder-Decoder Model for Human-Like Summarization

arXiv 2410.16842 ↗First posted 22 Oct 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent times, extracting valuable information from large text is making significant progress. Especially in the current era of social media, people expect quick bites of information. Automatic text summarization seeks to tackle this by slimming large texts down into more manageable summaries. This important research area can aid in decision-making by digging out salient content from large text. With the progress in deep learning models, significant work in language models has emerged. The encoder-decoder framework in deep learning has become the central approach for automatic text summarization. This work leverages transformer-based BART model for human-like summarization which is an open-ended problem with many challenges. On training and fine-tuning the encoder-decoder model, it is tested with diverse sample articles and the quality of summaries of diverse samples is assessed based on human evaluation parameters. Further, the finetuned model performance is compared with the baseline pretrained model based on evaluation metrics like ROUGE score and BERTScore. Additionally, domain adaptation of the model is required for improved performance of abstractive summarization of dialogues between interlocutors. On investigating, the above popular evaluation metrics are found to be insensitive to factual errors. Further investigation of the summaries generated by finetuned model is done using the contemporary evaluation metrics of factual consistency like WeCheck and SummaC. Empirical results on BBC News articles highlight that the gold standard summaries written by humans are more factually consistent by 17% than the abstractive summaries generated by finetuned model.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Oct 2024.

Builds on

11 of 23 references.

References · 11

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  3. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
  4. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  5. 2018Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarizationcited by 1,317
  6. 2017Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networkscited by 1,292
  7. 2019PEGASUS: Pre-training with Extracted Gap-sentences for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 1,102
  8. 2021SummaC: Re-Visiting NLI-based Models for Inconsistency Detection in Summarizationcited by 407
  9. 2020Asking and Answering Questions to Evaluate the Factual Consistency of Summariescited by 378
  10. 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning For Sequence to Sequence Modelscited by 39
  11. 2022WeCheck: Strong Factual Consistency Checker via Weakly Supervised Learningcited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.