mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning Latent Representations to Co-Adapt to Humans

arXiv 2212.09586 ↗First posted 19 Dec 2022cs.RO cs.AI cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

When robots interact with humans in homes, roads, or factories the human's behavior often changes in response to the robot. Non-stationary humans are challenging for robot learners: actions the robot has learned to coordinate with the original human may fail after the human adapts to the robot. In this paper we introduce an algorithmic formalism that enables robots (i.e., ego agents) to co-adapt alongside dynamic humans (i.e., other agents) using only the robot's low-level states, actions, and rewards. A core challenge is that humans not only react to the robot's behavior, but the way in which humans react inevitably changes both over time and between users. To deal with this challenge, our insight is that -- instead of building an exact model of the human -- robots can learn and reason over high-level representations of the human's policy and policy dynamics. Applying this insight we develop RILI: Robustly Influencing Latent Intent. RILI first embeds low-level robot observations into predictions of the human's latent strategy and strategy dynamics. Next, RILI harnesses these predictions to select actions that influence the adaptive human towards advantageous, high reward behaviors over repeated interactions. We demonstrate that -- given RILI's measured performance with users sampled from an underlying distribution -- we can probabilistically bound RILI's expected performance across new humans sampled from the same distribution. Our simulated experiments compare RILI to state-of-the-art representation and reinforcement learning baselines, and show that RILI better learns to coordinate with imperfect, noisy, and time-varying agents. Finally, we conduct two user studies where RILI co-adapts alongside actual humans in a game of tag and a tower-building task. See videos of our user studies here: https://youtu.be/WYGO5amDXbQ

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Dec 2022.

Builds on

33 of 66 references.

References · 33

  1. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  2. 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,519
  3. 2017Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 733
  4. 2017Exploring Generalization in Deep Learningcited by 595
  5. 2016Learning to Communicate with Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 561
  6. 2019On the Utility of Learning about Humans for Human-AI Coordinationcited by 345
  7. 2018Human-level performance in first-person multiplayer games with population-based deep reinforcement learningcited by 260
  8. 2017Learning with Opponent-Learning Awarenesscited by 218
  9. 2021Collaborating with Humans without Human Datacited by 139
  10. 2020Reward-rational (implicit) choice: A unifying formalism for reward learningcited by 119
  11. 2018Learning when to Communicate at Scale in Multiagent Cooperative and Competitive Taskscited by 114
  12. 2020Shared Experience Actor-Critic for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 114
21 more
  1. 2017A Survey of Learning in Multiagent Environments: Dealing with Non-Stationaritycited by 93
  2. 2020Learning Latent Representations to Influence Multi-Agent Interactioncited by 92
  3. 2018Modeling Others using Oneself in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 64
  4. 2018Emergent Communication through Negotiationcited by 62
  5. 2020Emergent Social Learning via Multi-agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 44
  6. 2022Model-Free Opponent Shapingcited by 43
  7. 2021Deep Multiagent Reinforcement Learning: Challenges and Directionscited by 42
  8. 2014Efficient Model Learning for Human-Robot Collaborative Taskscited by 35
  9. 2021Influencing Towards Stable Multi-Agent Interactionscited by 24
  10. 2017Game-Theoretic Modeling of Human Adaptation in Human-Robot Collaborationcited by 21
  11. 2018PAC-Bayes Control: Learning Policies that Provably Generalize to Novel Environmentscited by 21
  12. 2021Safety Assurances for Human-Robot Interaction via Confidence-aware Game-theoretic Human Modelscited by 21
  13. 2019Learning to Interactively Learn and Assistcited by 20
  14. 2022On PAC-Bayesian reconstruction guarantees for VAEscited by 20
  15. 2022Conditional Imitation Learning for Multi-Agent Gamescited by 13
  16. 2019Learning from My Partner's Actions: Roles in Decentralized Robot Teamscited by 10
  17. 2022RILI: Robustly Influencing Latent Intentcited by 8
  18. 2020The State of Industrial Robotics: Emerging Technologies, Challenges, and Key Research Directionscited by 7
  19. 2020RAT iLQR: A Risk Auto-Tuning Controller to Optimally Account for Stochastic Model Mismatchcited by 4
  20. 2022Towards Robots that Influence Humans over Long-Term Interactioncited by 3
  21. 2022Seamless Interaction Design with Coexistence and Cooperation Modes for Robust Human-Robot Collaborationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

5 papers.