mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Curriculum Labeling: Revisiting Pseudo-Labeling for Semi-Supervised Learning

arXiv 2001.06001 ↗First posted 16 Jan 2020cs.LG cs.CV stat.MLcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper we revisit the idea of pseudo-labeling in the context of semi-supervised learning where a learning algorithm has access to a small set of labeled samples and a large set of unlabeled samples. Pseudo-labeling works by applying pseudo-labels to samples in the unlabeled set by using a model trained on the combination of the labeled samples and any previously pseudo-labeled samples, and iteratively repeating this process in a self-training cycle. Current methods seem to have abandoned this approach in favor of consistency regularization methods that train models under a combination of different styles of self-supervised losses on the unlabeled samples and standard supervised losses on the labeled samples. We empirically demonstrate that pseudo-labeling can in fact be competitive with the state-of-the-art, while being more resilient to out-of-distribution samples in the unlabeled set. We identify two key factors that allow pseudo-labeling to achieve such remarkable results (1) applying curriculum learning principles and (2) avoiding concept drift by restarting model parameters before each self-training cycle. We obtain 94.91% accuracy on CIFAR-10 using only 4,000 labeled samples, and 68.87% top-1 accuracy on Imagenet-ILSVRC using only 10% of the labeled samples. The code is available at https://github.com/uvavision/Curriculum-Labeling

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Jan 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 8; 2022: 4; 2023: 0; 2024: 2.

14 papers.

Sort: