Data Consistency for Weakly Supervised Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In many applications, training machine learning models involves using large amounts of human-annotated data. Obtaining precise labels for the data is expensive. Instead, training with weak supervision provides a low-cost alternative. We propose a novel weak supervision algorithm that processes noisy labels, i.e., weak signals, while also considering features of the training data to produce accurate labels for training. Our method searches over classifiers of the data representation to find plausible labelings. We call this paradigm data consistent weak supervision. A key facet of our framework is that we are able to estimate labels for data examples low or no coverage from the weak supervision. In addition, we make no assumptions about the joint distribution of the weak signals and true labels of the data. Instead, we use weak signals and the data features to solve a constrained optimization that enforces data consistency among the labels we generate. Empirical evaluation of our method on different datasets shows that it significantly outperforms state-of-the-art weak supervision methods on both text and image classification tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2022.
Builds on
26 of 63 references.
References · 26
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
- 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 670
- 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
- 2016Data Programming: Creating Large Training Sets, Quicklycited by 246
- 2016Harnessing Deep Neural Networks with Logic Rulescited by 135
- 2018Training Complex Models with Multi-Task Weak Supervisioncited by 106
- 2020Fast and Three-rious: Speeding Up Weak Supervision with Triplet Methodscited by 98
- 2021WRENCH: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Weak Supervisioncited by 95
- 2020Error-Bounded Correction of Noisy Labelscited by 74
14 more
- 2020Learning from Rules Generalizing Labeled Exemplarscited by 59
- 2018Snorkel DryBell: A Case Study in Deploying Weak Supervision at Industrial Scalecited by 52
- 2017Learning From Noisy Singly-labeled Datacited by 50
- 2021Self-Training with Weak Supervisioncited by 49
- 2015Unsupervised Ensemble Learning with Dependent Classifierscited by 19
- 2016Unsupervised Risk Estimation Using Only Conditional Independence Structurecited by 17
- 2020Constrained Labeling for Weakly Supervised Learningcited by 10
- 2015Optimally Combining Classifiers Using Unlabeled Datacited by 9
- 2018Adversarial Label Learningcited by 9
- 2020Learning from Imperfect Annotationscited by 7
- 2021Comparing the Value of Labeled and Unlabeled Data in Method-of-Moments Latent Variable Estimationcited by 7
- 2015Regularized Minimax Conditional Entropy for Crowdsourcingcited by 6
- 2020Train and You'll Miss It: Interactive Model Iteration with Weak Supervision and Pre-Trained Embeddingscited by 4
- 2016Clinical Tagging with Joint Probabilistic Modelscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2.
2 papers.
- 2022Losses over Labels: Weakly Supervised Learning via Direct Loss Constructioncited by 11
- 2022Label Propagation with Weak Supervisioncited by 9
- 2022Losses over Labels: Weakly Supervised Learning via Direct Loss Construction13 Dec 2022
- 2022Label Propagation with Weak Supervision7 Oct 2022