BigText-QA: Question Answering over a Large-Scale Hybrid Knowledge Graph
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Answering complex questions over textual resources remains a challenge, particularly when dealing with nuanced relationships between multiple entities expressed within natural-language sentences. To this end, curated knowledge bases (KBs) like YAGO, DBpedia, Freebase, and Wikidata have been widely used and gained great acceptance for question-answering (QA) applications in the past decade. While these KBs offer a structured knowledge representation, they lack the contextual diversity found in natural-language sources. To address this limitation, BigText-QA introduces an integrated QA approach, which is able to answer questions based on a more redundant form of a knowledge graph (KG) that organizes both structured and unstructured (i.e., "hybrid") knowledge in a unified graphical representation. Thereby, BigText-QA is able to combine the best of both worldsunicodex2013a canonical set of named entities, mapped to a structured background KB (such as YAGO or Wikidata), as well as an open set of textual clauses providing highly diversified relational paraphrases with rich context information. Our experimental results demonstrate that BigText-QA outperforms DrQA, a neural-network-based QA system, and achieves competitive results to QUEST, a graph-based unsupervised QA system.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Dec 2022.
Builds on
24 of 64 references.
References · 24
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
- 2019SpanBERT: Improving Pre-training by Representing and Predicting Spanscited by 832
- 2017Reading Wikipedia to Answer Open-Domain Questionscited by 777
- 2021QA-GNN: Reasoning with Language Models and Knowledge Graphs for Question Answeringcited by 386
- 2019PullNet: Open Domain Question Answering with Iterative Retrieval on Knowledge Bases and Textcited by 182
- 2016Language to Logical Form with Neural Attentioncited by 158
- 2018Higher-order Coreference Resolution with Coarse-to-fine Inferencecited by 150
- 2017Simple and Effective Multi-Paragraph Reading Comprehensioncited by 120
- 2020Efficient One-Pass End-to-End Entity Linking for Questionscited by 76
12 more
- 2021KG-FiD: Infusing Knowledge Graph in Fusion-in-Decoder for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 66
- 2020REL: An Entity Linker Standing on the Shoulders of Giantscited by 61
- 2020UniK-QA: Unified Representations of Structured and Unstructured Knowledge for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 61
- 2014Question Answering with Subgraph Embeddingscited by 56
- 2020Machine Knowledge: Creation and Curation of Comprehensive Knowledge Basescited by 55
- 2020A Survey on Complex Question Answering over Knowledge Base: Recent Advances and Challengescited by 47
- 2020FLERT: Document-Level Features for Named Entity Recognitioncited by 45
- 2022Grape: Knowledge Graph Enhanced Passage Reader for Open-domain Question Answeringcited by 22
- 2019Answering Complex Questions by Joining Multi-Document Evidence with Quasi Knowledge Graphscited by 21
- 2017Question Answering on Knowledge Bases and Text using Universal Schema and Memory Networkscited by 15
- 2015Multilingual Relation Extraction using Compositional Universal Schemacited by 11
- 2014GraphX: Unifying Data-Parallel and Graph-Parallel Analyticscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.