mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Birds of a Feather Trust Together: Knowing When to Trust a Classifier via Adaptive Neighborhood Aggregation

arXiv 2211.16466 ↗First posted 29 Nov 2022cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

How do we know when the predictions made by a classifier can be trusted? This is a fundamental problem that also has immense practical applicability, especially in safety-critical areas such as medicine and autonomous driving. The de facto approach of using the classifier's softmax outputs as a proxy for trustworthiness suffers from the over-confidence issue; while the most recent works incur problems such as additional retraining cost and accuracy versus trustworthiness trade-off. In this work, we argue that the trustworthiness of a classifier's prediction for a sample is highly associated with two factors: the sample's neighborhood information and the classifier's output. To combine the best of both worlds, we design a model-agnostic post-hoc approach NeighborAgg to leverage the two essential information via an adaptive neighborhood aggregation. Theoretically, we show that NeighborAgg is a generalized version of a one-hop graph convolutional network, inheriting the powerful modeling ability to capture the varying similarity between samples within each class. We also extend our approach to the closely related task of mislabel detection and provide a theoretical coverage guarantee to bound the false negative. Empirically, extensive experiments on image and tabular benchmarks verify our theory and suggest that NeighborAgg outperforms other methods, achieving state-of-the-art trustworthiness performance.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Nov 2022.

Builds on

27 of 46 references.

References · 27

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  3. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  4. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  5. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  6. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
  7. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  8. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
  9. 2017Billion-scale similarity search with GPUscited by 2,497
  10. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,385
  11. 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,485
  12. 2018Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertaintycited by 732
15 more
  1. 2018Predictive Uncertainty Estimation via Prior Networkscited by 557
  2. 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 413
  3. 2019Beyond temperature scaling: Obtaining well-calibrated multiclass probabilities with Dirichlet calibrationcited by 364
  4. 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 328
  5. 2020Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin Rankingcited by 261
  6. 2018To Trust Or Not To Trust A Classifiercited by 207
  7. 2019Addressing Failure Prediction by Learning Model Confidencecited by 186
  8. 2019Probabilistic Face Embeddingscited by 173
  9. 2020Posterior Network: Uncertainty Estimation without OOD Samples via Density-Based Pseudo-Countscited by 164
  10. 2019Ensemble Distribution Distillationcited by 158
  11. 2020Data Uncertainty Learning in Face Recognitioncited by 134
  12. 2022POEM: Out-of-Distribution Detection with Posterior Samplingcited by 108
  13. 2021Be Confident! Towards Trustworthy Graph Neural Networks via Confidence Calibrationcited by 92
  14. 2016On the Safety of Machine Learning: Cyber-Physical Systems, Decision Sciences, and Data Productscited by 52
  15. 2021Distribution-free calibration guarantees for histogram binning without sample splittingcited by 45

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.

7 papers.