PatchGT: Transformer over Non-trainable Clusters for Learning Graph Representations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recently the Transformer structure has shown good performances in graph learning tasks. However, these Transformer models directly work on graph nodes and may have difficulties learning high-level information. Inspired by the vision transformer, which applies to image patches, we propose a new Transformer-based graph neural network: Patch Graph Transformer (PatchGT). Unlike previous transformer-based models for learning graph representations, PatchGT learns from non-trainable graph patches, not from nodes directly. It can help save computation and improve the model performance. The key idea is to segment a graph into patches based on spectral clustering without any trainable parameters, with which the model can first use GNN layers to learn patch-level representations and then use Transformer to obtain graph-level representations. The architecture leverages the spectral information of graphs and combines the strengths of GNNs and Transformers. Further, we show the limitations of previous hierarchical trainable clusters theoretically and empirically. We also prove the proposed non-trainable spectral clustering method is permutation invariant and can help address the information bottlenecks in the graph. PatchGT achieves higher expressiveness than 1-WL-type GNNs, and the empirical study shows that PatchGT achieves competitive performances on benchmark datasets and provides interpretability to its predictions. The implementation of our algorithm is released at our Github repo: https://github.com/tufts-ml/PatchGT.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Nov 2022.
Builds on
33 of 44 references.
References · 33
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
- 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,919
- 2020Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 2,163
- 2015Gated Graph Sequence Neural Networkscited by 796
- 2018Hierarchical Graph Representation Learning with Differentiable Poolingcited by 787
- 2020TUDataset: A collection of benchmark datasets for learning with graphscited by 728
- 2020On the Bottleneck of Graph Neural Networks and its Practical Implicationscited by 631
- 2019Graph Transformer Networkscited by 523
21 more
- 2019Graph U-Netscited by 492
- 2021Rethinking Graph Transformers with Spectral Attentioncited by 473
- 2019Self-Attention Graph Poolingcited by 421
- 2019Revisiting Graph Neural Networks: All We Have is Low-Pass Filterscited by 261
- 2021Weisfeiler and Lehman Go Cellular: CW Networkscited by 218
- 2022Patches Are All You Need?cited by 201
- 2022Representing Long-Range Context for Graph Neural Networks with Global Attentioncited by 195
- 2022Structure-Aware Transformer for Graph Representation Learningcited by 194
- 2022Sign and Basis Invariant Networks for Spectral Graph Representation Learningcited by 179
- 2021GraphiT: Encoding Graph Structure in Transformerscited by 147
- 2021Nested Graph Neural Networkscited by 137
- 2021AMMUS : A Survey of Transformer-based Pretrained Models in Natural Language Processingcited by 131
- 2021Accurate Learning of Graph Representations with Graph Multiset Poolingcited by 120
- 2021Dive into Deep Learningcited by 111
- 2019Graph Convolutional Networks with EigenPoolingcited by 94
- 2021Understanding Pooling in Graph Neural Networkscited by 69
- 2020Memory-Based Graph Networkscited by 56
- 2019Universal Graph Transformer Self-Attention Networkscited by 41
- 2022Graph Attention Retrospectivecited by 24
- 2019Towards Interpretable Sparse Graph Representation Learning with Laplacian Poolingcited by 20
- 2020Segmented Graph-Bert for Graph Instance Modelingcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 3; 2025: 1.
8 papers.
- 2024Graph Transformers: A Surveycited by 32
- 2024Efficient Large-Scale Traffic Forecasting with Transformers: A Spatial Data Management Perspectivecited by 26
- 2023Enhancing Graph Transformers with Hierarchical Distance Structural Encodingcited by 16
- 2023AGFormer: Efficient Graph Representation with Anchor-Graph Transformercited by 5
- 2025Are Graph Transformers Necessary? Efficient Long-Range Message Passing with Fractal Nodes in MPNNscited by 3
- 2023URLOST: Unsupervised Representation Learning without Stationarity or Topologycited by 1
- 2023Attacking Graph Neural Networks with Bit Flips: Weisfeiler and Lehman Go Indifferentcited by 0
- 2024Neighbour-level Message Interaction Encoding for Improved Representation Learning on Graphscited by 0
- 2025Are Graph Transformers Necessary? Efficient Long-Range Message Passing with Fractal Nodes in MPNNs17 Nov 2025
- 2024Efficient Large-Scale Traffic Forecasting with Transformers: A Spatial Data Management Perspective13 Dec 2024
- 2024Graph Transformers: A Survey13 Jul 2024
- 2024Neighbour-level Message Interaction Encoding for Improved Representation Learning on Graphs15 Apr 2024
- 2023Attacking Graph Neural Networks with Bit Flips: Weisfeiler and Lehman Go Indifferent2 Nov 2023
- 2023URLOST: Unsupervised Representation Learning without Stationarity or Topology6 Oct 2023
- 2023Enhancing Graph Transformers with Hierarchical Distance Structural Encoding22 Aug 2023
- 2023AGFormer: Efficient Graph Representation with Anchor-Graph Transformer12 May 2023