Link Prediction with Non-Contrastive Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A recent focal area in the space of graph neural networks (GNNs) is graph self-supervised learning (SSL), which aims to derive useful node representations without labeled data. Notably, many state-of-the-art graph SSL methods are contrastive methods, which use a combination of positive and negative samples to learn node representations. Owing to challenges in negative sampling (slowness and model sensitivity), recent literature introduced non-contrastive methods, which instead only use positive samples. Though such methods have shown promising performance in node-level tasks, their suitability for link prediction tasks, which are concerned with predicting link existence between pairs of nodes (and have broad applicability to recommendation systems contexts) is yet unexplored. In this work, we extensively evaluate the performance of existing non-contrastive methods for link prediction in both transductive and inductive settings. While most existing non-contrastive methods perform poorly overall, we find that, surprisingly, BGRL generally performs well in transductive settings. However, it performs poorly in the more realistic inductive settings where the model has to generalize to links to/from unseen nodes. We find that non-contrastive models tend to overfit to the training graph and use this analysis to propose T-BGRL, a novel non-contrastive framework that incorporates cheap corruptions to improve the generalization ability of the model. This simple modification strongly improves inductive performance in 5/6 of our datasets, with up to a 120% improvement in Hits@50--all with comparable speed to other non-contrastive baselines and up to 14x faster than the best-performing contrastive baseline. Our work imparts interesting findings about non-contrastive learning for link prediction and paves the way for future researchers to further expand upon this area.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 50 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Nov 2022.
Builds on
50 of 72 references.
References · 50
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
- 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
- 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,866
- 2020Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 2,163
- 2016node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networkscited by 1,918
- 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,838
- 2020Graph Contrastive Learning with Augmentationscited by 1,208
- 2020LightGCN: Simplifying and Powering Graph Convolution Network for Recommendationcited by 1,139
- 2018Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for Web-Scale Recommender Systemscited by 1,138
38 more
- 2018Deep Graph Infomaxcited by 1,106
- 2018Pitfalls of Graph Neural Network Evaluationcited by 1,007
- 2018Link Prediction Based on Graph Neural Networkscited by 832
- 2020Contrastive Multi-View Representation Learning on Graphscited by 652
- 2020Deep Graph Contrastive Representation Learningcited by 539
- 2014Deep metric learning using Triplet networkcited by 422
- 2018GraphRNN: Generating Realistic Graphs with Deep Auto-regressive Modelscited by 413
- 2018Deep Learning on Graphs: A Surveycited by 393
- 2021Understanding self-supervised Learning Dynamics without Contrastive Pairscited by 256
- 2021Large-Scale Representation Learning on Graphs via Bootstrappingcited by 186
- 2022Contrastive and Non-Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning Recover Global and Local Spectral Embedding Methodscited by 149
- 2021From Canonical Correlation Analysis to Self-supervised Graph Neural Networkscited by 141
- 2021ETA Prediction with Graph Neural Networks in Google Mapscited by 130
- 2020Neural Collaborative Filtering vs. Matrix Factorization Revisitedcited by 123
- 2020Self-supervised Learning on Graphs: Deep Insights and New Directioncited by 108
- 2020Line Graph Neural Networks for Link Predictioncited by 89
- 2019Inductive Matrix Completion Based on Graph Neural Networkscited by 86
- 2021Graph Barlow Twins: A self-supervised representation learning framework for graphscited by 85
- 2021Few-Shot Graph Learning for Molecular Property Predictioncited by 81
- 2022Graph Neural Networks for Link Prediction with Subgraph Sketchingcited by 81
- 2022Graph Rationalization with Environment-based Augmentationscited by 70
- 2021Learning from Counterfactual Links for Link Predictioncited by 69
- 2020Understanding Negative Sampling in Graph Representation Learningcited by 66
- 2022Graph Data Augmentation for Graph Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 62
- 2021Graph Trend Filtering Networks for Recommendationscited by 53
- 2022Graph-based Molecular Representation Learningcited by 51
- 2021Automated Self-Supervised Learning for Graphscited by 50
- 2022Linkless Link Prediction via Relational Distillationcited by 39
- 2022The Mechanism of Prediction Head in Non-contrastive Self-supervised Learningcited by 38
- 2021Prototypical Graph Contrastive Learningcited by 37
- 2022Multi-task Self-supervised Graph Neural Networks Enable Stronger Task Generalizationcited by 35
- 2020Inductive Link Prediction for Nodes Having Only Attribute Informationcited by 30
- 2022Algorithm and System Co-design for Efficient Subgraph-based Graph Representation Learningcited by 28
- 2021Self-supervised Graph Neural Networks without explicit negative samplingcited by 25
- 2020Knowing your FATE: Friendship, Action and Temporal Explanations for User Engagement Prediction on Social Appscited by 23
- 2021Pairwise Learning for Neural Link Predictioncited by 23
- 2019Labeled Graph Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 12
- 2022Flashlight: Scalable Link Prediction with Effective Decoderscited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 5; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
11 papers.
- 2023Simple and Asymmetric Graph Contrastive Learning without Augmentationscited by 38
- 2024Personalized Audiobook Recommendations at Spotify Through Graph Neural Networkscited by 14
- 2023A Topological Perspective on Demystifying GNN-Based Link Prediction Performancecited by 11
- 2024Addressing Shortcomings in Fair Graph Learning Datasets: Towards a New Benchmarkcited by 7
- 2023Union Subgraph Neural Networkscited by 6
- 2023CARL-G: Clustering-Accelerated Representation Learning on Graphscited by 6
- 2023Efficient Link Prediction via GNN Layers Induced by Negative Samplingcited by 6
- 2024Node Duplication Improves Cold-start Link Predictioncited by 4
- 2025Enhancing Contrastive Link Prediction With Edge Balancing Augmentationcited by 0
- 2025WBT-BGRL: A Non-Contrastive Weighted Bipartite Link Prediction Model for Inductive Learningcited by 0
- 2026Instance Discrimination for Link Predictioncited by 0
- 2026Instance Discrimination for Link Prediction18 May 2026
- 2025WBT-BGRL: A Non-Contrastive Weighted Bipartite Link Prediction Model for Inductive Learning28 Oct 2025
- 2025Enhancing Contrastive Link Prediction With Edge Balancing Augmentation20 Aug 2025
- 2024Addressing Shortcomings in Fair Graph Learning Datasets: Towards a New Benchmark9 Mar 2024
- 2024Personalized Audiobook Recommendations at Spotify Through Graph Neural Networks8 Mar 2024
- 2024Node Duplication Improves Cold-start Link Prediction15 Feb 2024
- 2023Simple and Asymmetric Graph Contrastive Learning without Augmentations29 Oct 2023
- 2023Efficient Link Prediction via GNN Layers Induced by Negative Sampling14 Oct 2023
- 2023A Topological Perspective on Demystifying GNN-Based Link Prediction Performance6 Oct 2023
- 2023CARL-G: Clustering-Accelerated Representation Learning on Graphs12 Jun 2023
- 2023Union Subgraph Neural Networks25 May 2023