mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Addressing Shortcomings in Fair Graph Learning Datasets: Towards a New Benchmark

arXiv 2403.06017 ↗First posted 9 Mar 2024cs.LG cs.CYcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Fair graph learning plays a pivotal role in numerous practical applications. Recently, many fair graph learning methods have been proposed; however, their evaluation often relies on poorly constructed semi-synthetic datasets or substandard real-world datasets. In such cases, even a basic Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) can outperform Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) in both utility and fairness. In this work, we illustrate that many datasets fail to provide meaningful information in the edges, which may challenge the necessity of using graph structures in these problems. To address these issues, we develop and introduce a collection of synthetic, semi-synthetic, and real-world datasets that fulfill a broad spectrum of requirements. These datasets are thoughtfully designed to include relevant graph structures and bias information crucial for the fair evaluation of models. The proposed synthetic and semi-synthetic datasets offer the flexibility to create data with controllable bias parameters, thereby enabling the generation of desired datasets with user-defined bias values with ease. Moreover, we conduct systematic evaluations of these proposed datasets and establish a unified evaluation approach for fair graph learning models. Our extensive experimental results with fair graph learning methods across our datasets demonstrate their effectiveness in benchmarking the performance of these methods. Our datasets and the code for reproducing our experiments are available at https://github.com/XweiQ/Benchmark-GraphFairness.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Mar 2024.

Builds on

22 of 38 references.

References · 22

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
  3. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  4. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  5. 2018Link Prediction Based on Graph Neural Networkscited by 829
  6. 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
  7. 2019Graph Neural Networks for Social Recommendationcited by 711
  8. 2018Learning Adversarially Fair and Transferable Representationscited by 353
  9. 2020Say No to the Discrimination: Learning Fair Graph Neural Networks with Limited Sensitive Attribute Informationcited by 168
  10. 2021Towards a Unified Framework for Fair and Stable Graph Representation Learningcited by 128
  11. 2022A Comprehensive Survey on Trustworthy Graph Neural Networks: Privacy, Robustness, Fairness, and Explainabilitycited by 118
  12. 2021Causal Attention for Interpretable and Generalizable Graph Classificationcited by 108
10 more
  1. 2021EDITS: Modeling and Mitigating Data Bias for Graph Neural Networkscited by 92
  2. 2022Neo-GNNs: Neighborhood Overlap-aware Graph Neural Networks for Link Predictioncited by 78
  3. 2021Learning from Counterfactual Links for Link Predictioncited by 69
  4. 2022Improving Fairness in Graph Neural Networks via Mitigating Sensitive Attribute Leakagecited by 61
  5. 2022Learning Fair Node Representations with Graph Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 58
  6. 2022Task-Adaptive Few-shot Node Classificationcited by 43
  7. 2022Improving Molecular Contrastive Learning via Faulty Negative Mitigation and Decomposed Fragment Contrastcited by 37
  8. 2020A Survey on Graph Neural Networks for Knowledge Graph Completioncited by 26
  9. 2023A Unified Framework of Graph Information Bottleneck for Robustness and Membership Privacycited by 14
  10. 2022Link Prediction with Non-Contrastive Learningcited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

7 papers.