Quantifying and Learning Static vs. Dynamic Information in Deep Spatiotemporal Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
There is limited understanding of the information captured by deep spatiotemporal models in their intermediate representations. For example, while evidence suggests that action recognition algorithms are heavily influenced by visual appearance in single frames, no quantitative methodology exists for evaluating such static bias in the latent representation compared to bias toward dynamics. We tackle this challenge by proposing an approach for quantifying the static and dynamic biases of any spatiotemporal model, and apply our approach to three tasks, action recognition, automatic video object segmentation (AVOS) and video instance segmentation (VIS). Our key findings are: (i) Most examined models are biased toward static information. (ii) Some datasets that are assumed to be biased toward dynamics are actually biased toward static information. (iii) Individual channels in an architecture can be biased toward static, dynamic or a combination of the two. (iv) Most models converge to their culminating biases in the first half of training. We then explore how these biases affect performance on dynamically biased datasets. For action recognition, we propose StaticDropout, a semantically guided dropout that debiases a model from static information toward dynamics. For AVOS, we design a better combination of fusion and cross connection layers compared with previous architectures.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2022.
Builds on
44 of 80 references.
References · 44
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,259
- 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,210
- 2017Non-local Neural Networkscited by 2,290
- 2017Arbitrary Style Transfer in Real-time with Adaptive Instance Normalizationcited by 1,998
- 2018SlowFast Networks for Video Recognitioncited by 1,862
- 2021Is Space-Time Attention All You Need for Video Understanding?cited by 1,609
- 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
- 2017The "something something" video database for learning and evaluating visual common sensecited by 1,092
- 2014Two-Stream Convolutional Networks for Action Recognition in Videoscited by 1,067
- 2021Multiscale Vision Transformerscited by 896
32 more
- 2020X3D: Expanding Architectures for Efficient Video Recognitioncited by 635
- 2020End-to-End Video Instance Segmentation with Transformerscited by 443
- 2019Video Instance Segmentationcited by 391
- 2018YouTube-VOS: A Large-Scale Video Object Segmentation Benchmarkcited by 381
- 2021Generic Attention-model Explainability for Interpreting Bi-Modal and Encoder-Decoder Transformerscited by 316
- 2021Keeping Your Eye on the Ball: Trajectory Attention in Video Transformerscited by 224
- 2017Learning Spatio-Temporal Features with 3D Residual Networks for Action Recognitioncited by 178
- 2019REPAIR: Removing Representation Bias by Dataset Resamplingcited by 157
- 2021Occluded Video Instance Segmentation: A Benchmarkcited by 154
- 2021Self-supervised Video Object Segmentation by Motion Groupingcited by 147
- 2021A Survey on Deep Learning Technique for Video Segmentationcited by 132
- 2019Why Can't I Dance in the Mall? Learning to Mitigate Scene Bias in Action Recognitioncited by 117
- 2019Something-Else: Compositional Action Recognition with Spatial-Temporal Interaction Networkscited by 112
- 2020A Comprehensive Study of Deep Video Action Recognitioncited by 87
- 2017FusionSeg: Learning to combine motion and appearance for fully automatic segmention of generic objects in videoscited by 77
- 2017Learning Video Object Segmentation with Visual Memorycited by 66
- 2019Only Time Can Tell: Discovering Temporal Data for Temporal Modelingcited by 66
- 2017Semantic Video CNNs through Representation Warpingcited by 65
- 2020Betrayed by Motion: Camouflaged Object Discovery via Motion Segmentationcited by 62
- 2020A Disentangling Invertible Interpretation Network for Explaining Latent Representationscited by 57
- 2020Informative Dropout for Robust Representation Learning: A Shape-bias Perspectivecited by 57
- 2021Shape or Texture: Understanding Discriminative Features in CNNscited by 52
- 2020Interactive Video Stylization Using Few-Shot Patch-Based Trainingcited by 43
- 2022A Deeper Dive Into What Deep Spatiotemporal Networks Encode: Quantifying Static vs. Dynamic Informationcited by 24
- 2018Video Time: Properties, Encoders and Evaluationcited by 19
- 2016Human Action Recognition without Humancited by 17
- 2022Is Appearance Free Action Recognition Possible?cited by 16
- 2020Reducing the Annotation Effort for Video Object Segmentation Datasetscited by 15
- 2020Interpreting video features: a comparison of 3D convolutional networks and convolutional LSTM networkscited by 12
- 2019Explainable Deep Learning for Video Recognition Tasks: A Framework & Recommendationscited by 7
- 2022Deeply Explain CNN via Hierarchical Decompositioncited by 6
- 2021Interpretable Deep Feature Propagation for Early Action Recognitioncited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2025Universal Sparse Autoencoders: Interpretable Cross-Model Concept Alignmentcited by 62
- 2024Understanding Video Transformers via Universal Concept Discoverycited by 22
- 2025Prisma: An Open Source Toolkit for Mechanistic Interpretability in Vision and Videocited by 20
- 2025HiERO: understanding the hierarchy of human behavior enhances reasoning on egocentric videoscited by 7
- 2026MODIX: A Training-Free Multimodal Information-Driven Positional Index Scaling for Vision-Language Modelscited by 2
- 2025PixFoundation 2.0: Do Video Multi-Modal LLMs Use Motion in Visual Grounding?cited by 1
- 2026What, Where, and How: Probing Spatiotemporal Representations in Video Foundation Modelscited by 0
- 2026What, Where, and How: Probing Spatiotemporal Representations in Video Foundation Models1 Sep 2026
- 2026MODIX: A Training-Free Multimodal Information-Driven Positional Index Scaling for Vision-Language Models14 Apr 2026
- 2025PixFoundation 2.0: Do Video Multi-Modal LLMs Use Motion in Visual Grounding?2 Sep 2025
- 2025HiERO: understanding the hierarchy of human behavior enhances reasoning on egocentric videos19 May 2025
- 2025Prisma: An Open Source Toolkit for Mechanistic Interpretability in Vision and Video28 Apr 2025
- 2025Universal Sparse Autoencoders: Interpretable Cross-Model Concept Alignment6 Feb 2025
- 2024Understanding Video Transformers via Universal Concept Discovery19 Jan 2024