mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Quantifying and Learning Static vs. Dynamic Information in Deep Spatiotemporal Networks

arXiv 2211.01783 ↗First posted 3 Nov 2022cs.CVcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

There is limited understanding of the information captured by deep spatiotemporal models in their intermediate representations. For example, while evidence suggests that action recognition algorithms are heavily influenced by visual appearance in single frames, no quantitative methodology exists for evaluating such static bias in the latent representation compared to bias toward dynamics. We tackle this challenge by proposing an approach for quantifying the static and dynamic biases of any spatiotemporal model, and apply our approach to three tasks, action recognition, automatic video object segmentation (AVOS) and video instance segmentation (VIS). Our key findings are: (i) Most examined models are biased toward static information. (ii) Some datasets that are assumed to be biased toward dynamics are actually biased toward static information. (iii) Individual channels in an architecture can be biased toward static, dynamic or a combination of the two. (iv) Most models converge to their culminating biases in the first half of training. We then explore how these biases affect performance on dynamically biased datasets. For action recognition, we propose StaticDropout, a semantically guided dropout that debiases a model from static information toward dynamics. For AVOS, we design a better combination of fusion and cross connection layers compared with previous architectures.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2022.

Builds on

44 of 80 references.

References · 44

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,259
  4. 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,210
  5. 2017Non-local Neural Networkscited by 2,290
  6. 2017Arbitrary Style Transfer in Real-time with Adaptive Instance Normalizationcited by 1,998
  7. 2018SlowFast Networks for Video Recognitioncited by 1,862
  8. 2021Is Space-Time Attention All You Need for Video Understanding?cited by 1,609
  9. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
  10. 2017The "something something" video database for learning and evaluating visual common sensecited by 1,092
  11. 2014Two-Stream Convolutional Networks for Action Recognition in Videoscited by 1,067
  12. 2021Multiscale Vision Transformerscited by 896
32 more
  1. 2020X3D: Expanding Architectures for Efficient Video Recognitioncited by 635
  2. 2020End-to-End Video Instance Segmentation with Transformerscited by 443
  3. 2019Video Instance Segmentationcited by 391
  4. 2018YouTube-VOS: A Large-Scale Video Object Segmentation Benchmarkcited by 381
  5. 2021Generic Attention-model Explainability for Interpreting Bi-Modal and Encoder-Decoder Transformerscited by 316
  6. 2021Keeping Your Eye on the Ball: Trajectory Attention in Video Transformerscited by 224
  7. 2017Learning Spatio-Temporal Features with 3D Residual Networks for Action Recognitioncited by 178
  8. 2019REPAIR: Removing Representation Bias by Dataset Resamplingcited by 157
  9. 2021Occluded Video Instance Segmentation: A Benchmarkcited by 154
  10. 2021Self-supervised Video Object Segmentation by Motion Groupingcited by 147
  11. 2021A Survey on Deep Learning Technique for Video Segmentationcited by 132
  12. 2019Why Can't I Dance in the Mall? Learning to Mitigate Scene Bias in Action Recognitioncited by 117
  13. 2019Something-Else: Compositional Action Recognition with Spatial-Temporal Interaction Networkscited by 112
  14. 2020A Comprehensive Study of Deep Video Action Recognitioncited by 87
  15. 2017FusionSeg: Learning to combine motion and appearance for fully automatic segmention of generic objects in videoscited by 77
  16. 2017Learning Video Object Segmentation with Visual Memorycited by 66
  17. 2019Only Time Can Tell: Discovering Temporal Data for Temporal Modelingcited by 66
  18. 2017Semantic Video CNNs through Representation Warpingcited by 65
  19. 2020Betrayed by Motion: Camouflaged Object Discovery via Motion Segmentationcited by 62
  20. 2020A Disentangling Invertible Interpretation Network for Explaining Latent Representationscited by 57
  21. 2020Informative Dropout for Robust Representation Learning: A Shape-bias Perspectivecited by 57
  22. 2021Shape or Texture: Understanding Discriminative Features in CNNscited by 52
  23. 2020Interactive Video Stylization Using Few-Shot Patch-Based Trainingcited by 43
  24. 2022A Deeper Dive Into What Deep Spatiotemporal Networks Encode: Quantifying Static vs. Dynamic Informationcited by 24
  25. 2018Video Time: Properties, Encoders and Evaluationcited by 19
  26. 2016Human Action Recognition without Humancited by 17
  27. 2022Is Appearance Free Action Recognition Possible?cited by 16
  28. 2020Reducing the Annotation Effort for Video Object Segmentation Datasetscited by 15
  29. 2020Interpreting video features: a comparison of 3D convolutional networks and convolutional LSTM networkscited by 12
  30. 2019Explainable Deep Learning for Video Recognition Tasks: A Framework & Recommendationscited by 7
  31. 2022Deeply Explain CNN via Hierarchical Decompositioncited by 6
  32. 2021Interpretable Deep Feature Propagation for Early Action Recognitioncited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

7 papers.