mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Interpreting video features: a comparison of 3D convolutional networks and convolutional LSTM networks

arXiv 2002.00367 ↗First posted 2 Feb 2020cs.CVcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A number of techniques for interpretability have been presented for deep learning in computer vision, typically with the goal of understanding what the networks have based their classification on. However, interpretability for deep video architectures is still in its infancy and we do not yet have a clear concept of how to decode spatiotemporal features. In this paper, we present a study comparing how 3D convolutional networks and convolutional LSTM networks learn features across temporally dependent frames. This is the first comparison of two video models that both convolve to learn spatial features but have principally different methods of modeling time. Additionally, we extend the concept of meaningful perturbation introduced by citeMeaningFulPert to the temporal dimension, to identify the temporal part of a sequence most meaningful to the network for a classification decision. Our findings indicate that the 3D convolutional model concentrates on shorter events in the input sequence, and places its spatial focus on fewer, contiguous areas.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 4; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

12 papers.