Interpreting video features: a comparison of 3D convolutional networks and convolutional LSTM networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A number of techniques for interpretability have been presented for deep learning in computer vision, typically with the goal of understanding what the networks have based their classification on. However, interpretability for deep video architectures is still in its infancy and we do not yet have a clear concept of how to decode spatiotemporal features. In this paper, we present a study comparing how 3D convolutional networks and convolutional LSTM networks learn features across temporally dependent frames. This is the first comparison of two video models that both convolve to learn spatial features but have principally different methods of modeling time. Additionally, we extend the concept of meaningful perturbation introduced by citeMeaningFulPert to the temporal dimension, to identify the temporal part of a sequence most meaningful to the network for a classification decision. Our findings indicate that the 3D convolutional model concentrates on shorter events in the input sequence, and places its spatial focus on fewer, contiguous areas.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 4; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
12 papers.
- 2022Mitigating and Evaluating Static Bias of Action Representations in the Background and the Foregroundcited by 26
- 2022A Deeper Dive Into What Deep Spatiotemporal Networks Encode: Quantifying Static vs. Dynamic Informationcited by 24
- 2022Is Appearance Free Action Recognition Possible?cited by 16
- 2021Recur, Attend or Convolve? On Whether Temporal Modeling Matters for Cross-Domain Robustness in Action Recognitioncited by 7
- 2022Quantifying and Learning Static vs. Dynamic Information in Deep Spatiotemporal Networkscited by 7
- 2024An Integrated Framework for Multi-Granular Explanation of Video Summarizationcited by 1
- 2026Process-of-Thought Reasoning for Videoscited by 1
- 2021Encoder-Decoder Networks for Analyzing Thermal and Power Delivery Networkscited by 0
- 2025Supervised contrastive learning for cell stage classification of animal embryoscited by 0
- 2025Ground Reaction Force Estimation via Time-aware Knowledge Distillationcited by 0
- 2025An Experimental Study on Generating Plausible Textual Explanations for Video Summarizationcited by 0
- 2026Selective Correlation Based Knowledge Distillation for Ground Reaction Force Estimationcited by 0
- 2026Selective Correlation Based Knowledge Distillation for Ground Reaction Force Estimation27 Apr 2026
- 2026Process-of-Thought Reasoning for Videos7 Feb 2026
- 2025An Experimental Study on Generating Plausible Textual Explanations for Video Summarization30 Sep 2025
- 2025Ground Reaction Force Estimation via Time-aware Knowledge Distillation12 Jun 2025
- 2025Supervised contrastive learning for cell stage classification of animal embryos11 Feb 2025
- 2024An Integrated Framework for Multi-Granular Explanation of Video Summarization16 May 2024
- 2022Mitigating and Evaluating Static Bias of Action Representations in the Background and the Foreground23 Nov 2022
- 2022Quantifying and Learning Static vs. Dynamic Information in Deep Spatiotemporal Networks3 Nov 2022
- 2022Is Appearance Free Action Recognition Possible?13 Jul 2022
- 2022A Deeper Dive Into What Deep Spatiotemporal Networks Encode: Quantifying Static vs. Dynamic Information6 Jun 2022
- 2021Recur, Attend or Convolve? On Whether Temporal Modeling Matters for Cross-Domain Robustness in Action Recognition22 Dec 2021
- 2021Encoder-Decoder Networks for Analyzing Thermal and Power Delivery Networks27 Oct 2021