Investigating Content-Aware Neural Text-To-Speech MOS Prediction Using Prosodic and Linguistic Features
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Current state-of-the-art methods for automatic synthetic speech evaluation are based on MOS prediction neural models. Such MOS prediction models include MOSNet and LDNet that use spectral features as input, and SSL-MOS that relies on a pretrained self-supervised learning model that directly uses the speech signal as input. In modern high-quality neural TTS systems, prosodic appropriateness with regard to the spoken content is a decisive factor for speech naturalness. For this reason, we propose to include prosodic and linguistic features as additional inputs in MOS prediction systems, and evaluate their impact on the prediction outcome. We consider phoneme level F0 and duration features as prosodic inputs, as well as Tacotron encoder outputs, POS tags and BERT embeddings as higher-level linguistic inputs. All MOS prediction systems are trained on SOMOS, a neural TTS-only dataset with crowdsourced naturalness MOS evaluations. Results show that the proposed additional features are beneficial in the MOS prediction task, by improving the predicted MOS scores' correlation with the ground truths, both at utterance-level and system-level predictions.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Nov 2022.
Builds on
21 of 32 references.
References · 21
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2020MPNet: Masked and Permuted Pre-training for Language Understandingcited by 973
- 2022UTMOS: UTokyo-SaruLab System for VoiceMOS Challenge 2022cited by 381
- 2019MOSNet: Deep Learning based Objective Assessment for Voice Conversioncited by 126
- 2021Generalization Ability of MOS Prediction Networkscited by 69
- 2018The Voice Conversion Challenge 2018: Promoting Development of Parallel and Nonparallel Methodscited by 68
- 2020Non-Attentive Tacotron: Robust and Controllable Neural TTS Synthesis Including Unsupervised Duration Modelingcited by 65
- 2022The VoiceMOS Challenge 2022cited by 57
- 2021MBNet: MOS Prediction for Synthesized Speech with Mean-Bias Networkcited by 37
- 2018Quality-Net: An End-to-End Non-intrusive Speech Quality Assessment Model based on BLSTMcited by 36
- 2021Deep Learning Based Assessment of Synthetic Speech Naturalnesscited by 35
9 more
- 2021LDNet: Unified Listener Dependent Modeling in MOS Prediction for Synthetic Speechcited by 24
- 2016AutoMOS: Learning a non-intrusive assessor of naturalness-of-speechcited by 22
- 2021How do Voices from Past Speech Synthesis Challenges Compare Today?cited by 21
- 2021Utilizing Self-supervised Representations for MOS Predictioncited by 20
- 2021High Quality Streaming Speech Synthesis with Low, Sentence-Length-Independent Latencycited by 19
- 2022SOMOS: The Samsung Open MOS Dataset for the Evaluation of Neural Text-to-Speech Synthesiscited by 18
- 2022Fusion of Self-supervised Learned Models for MOS Predictioncited by 10
- 2021Prosodic Clustering for Phoneme-level Prosody Control in End-to-End Speech Synthesiscited by 8
- 2018An Empirical Analysis of the Correlation of Syntax and Prosodycited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
2 papers.