Bridging the visual gap in VLN via semantically richer instructions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The Visual-and-Language Navigation (VLN) task requires understanding a textual instruction to navigate a natural indoor environment using only visual information. While this is a trivial task for most humans, it is still an open problem for AI models. In this work, we hypothesize that poor use of the visual information available is at the core of the low performance of current models. To support this hypothesis, we provide experimental evidence showing that state-of-the-art models are not severely affected when they receive just limited or even no visual data, indicating a strong overfitting to the textual instructions. To encourage a more suitable use of the visual information, we propose a new data augmentation method that fosters the inclusion of more explicit visual information in the generation of textual navigational instructions. Our main intuition is that current VLN datasets include textual instructions that are intended to inform an expert navigator, such as a human, but not a beginner visual navigational agent, such as a randomly initialized DL model. Specifically, to bridge the visual semantic gap of current VLN datasets, we take advantage of metadata available for the Matterport3D dataset that, among others, includes information about object labels that are present in the scenes. Training a state-of-the-art model with the new set of instructions increase its performance by 8% in terms of success rate on unseen environments, demonstrating the advantages of the proposed data augmentation method.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Oct 2022.
Builds on
23 of 29 references.
References · 23
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
- 2019LXMERT: Learning Cross-Modality Encoder Representations from Transformerscited by 1,548
- 2017Matterport3D: Learning from RGB-D Data in Indoor Environmentscited by 1,354
- 2017Vision-and-Language Navigation: Interpreting visually-grounded navigation instructions in real environmentscited by 1,013
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
- 2021A Survey of Data Augmentation Approaches for NLPcited by 408
- 2018Speaker-Follower Models for Vision-and-Language Navigationcited by 337
- 2021History Aware Multimodal Transformer for Vision-and-Language Navigationcited by 268
- 2019Learning to Navigate Unseen Environments: Back Translation with Environmental Dropoutcited by 241
- 2018Deep Learning: A Critical Appraisalcited by 214
- 2019Vision-Language Navigation with Self-Supervised Auxiliary Reasoning Taskscited by 177
- 2020Improving Vision-and-Language Navigation with Image-Text Pairs from the Webcited by 177
11 more
- 2019Self-Monitoring Navigation Agent via Auxiliary Progress Estimationcited by 173
- 2019The Regretful Agent: Heuristic-Aided Navigation through Progress Estimationcited by 104
- 2018Overfitting or perfect fitting? Risk bounds for classification and regression rules that interpolatecited by 99
- 2021Structured Scene Memory for Vision-Language Navigationcited by 95
- 2017Measuring the tendency of CNNs to Learn Surface Statistical Regularitiescited by 87
- 2019Tactical Rewind: Self-Correction via Backtracking in Vision-and-Language Navigationcited by 81
- 2021Vision-Language Navigation with Random Environmental Mixupcited by 70
- 2021The Road to Know-Where: An Object-and-Room Informed Sequential BERT for Indoor Vision-Language Navigationcited by 60
- 2020Active Visual Information Gathering for Vision-Language Navigationcited by 55
- 2019Are You Looking? Grounding to Multiple Modalities in Vision-and-Language Navigationcited by 54
- 2021On the Evaluation of Vision-and-Language Navigation Instructionscited by 45
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.