A Detailed Study of Interpretability of Deep Neural Network based Top Taggers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent developments in the methods of explainable AI (XAI) allow researchers to explore the inner workings of deep neural networks (DNNs), revealing crucial information about input-output relationships and realizing how data connects with machine learning models. In this paper we explore interpretability of DNN models designed to identify jets coming from top quark decay in high energy proton-proton collisions at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). We review a subset of existing top tagger models and explore different quantitative methods to identify which features play the most important roles in identifying the top jets. We also investigate how and why feature importance varies across different XAI metrics, how correlations among features impact their explainability, and how latent space representations encode information as well as correlate with physically meaningful quantities. Our studies uncover some major pitfalls of existing XAI methods and illustrate how they can be overcome to obtain consistent and meaningful interpretation of these models. We additionally illustrate the activity of hidden layers as Neural Activation Pattern (NAP) diagrams and demonstrate how they can be used to understand how DNNs relay information across the layers and how this understanding can help to make such models significantly simpler by allowing effective model reoptimization and hyperparameter tuning. These studies not only facilitate a methodological approach to interpreting models but also unveil new insights about what these models learn. Incorporating these observations into augmented model design, we propose the Particle Flow Interaction Network (PFIN) model and demonstrate how interpretability-inspired model augmentation can improve top tagging performance.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 91 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2022.
Builds on
34 of 91 references.
References · 34
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
- 2017Deep Setscited by 1,394
- 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,201
- 2020Explainability in Graph Neural Networks: A Taxonomic Surveycited by 383
- 2018Understanding disentangling in β-VAEcited by 332
- 2016Model-Agnostic Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 219
- 2020Higher-Order Explanations of Graph Neural Networks via Relevant Walkscited by 138
- 2018Fast inference of deep neural networks in FPGAs for particle physicscited by 132
- 2020Lorentz Group Equivariant Neural Network for Particle Physicscited by 120
22 more
- 2022Particle Transformer for Jet Taggingcited by 95
- 2015Reducing Overfitting in Deep Networks by Decorrelating Representationscited by 94
- 2018Energy Flow Networks: Deep Sets for Particle Jetscited by 83
- 2020Explainable Artificial Intelligence: a Systematic Reviewcited by 79
- 2021How can I choose an explainer? An Application-grounded Evaluation of Post-hoc Explanationscited by 58
- 2020Distance-Weighted Graph Neural Networks on FPGAs for Real-Time Particle Reconstruction in High Energy Physicscited by 34
- 2019Variational AutoEncoder For Regression: Application to Brain Aging Analysiscited by 30
- 2020Accelerated Charged Particle Tracking with Graph Neural Networks on FPGAscited by 23
- 2017QCD-Aware Recursive Neural Networks for Jet Physicscited by 22
- 2017GLSR-VAE: Geodesic Latent Space Regularization for Variational AutoEncoder Architecturescited by 22
- 2021Better Latent Spaces for Better Autoencoderscited by 20
- 2021Bump Hunting in Latent Spacecited by 19
- 2017Jet Constituents for Deep Neural Network Based Top Quark Taggingcited by 15
- 2020Explainable AI for ML jet taggers using expert variables and layerwise relevance propagationcited by 14
- 2017Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks with jet constituents for boosted top tagging at the LHCcited by 13
- 2021Explaining machine-learned particle-flow reconstructioncited by 12
- 2021Bridging the Gap Between Explainable AI and Uncertainty Quantification to Enhance Trustabilitycited by 11
- 2022Snowmass 2021 Computational Frontier CompF03 Topical Group Report: Machine Learningcited by 10
- 2022Interpretable machine learning in Physicscited by 8
- 2019Interpretable Deep Learning for Two-Prong Jet Classification with Jet Spectracited by 7
- 2022Explainable AI for High Energy Physicscited by 7
- 2021Invariance-based Multi-Clustering of Latent Space Embeddings for Equivariant Learningcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2025Interpretable Machine Learning in Physics: A Reviewcited by 11
- 2022FAIR AI Models in High Energy Physicscited by 4
- 2022Feature Selection with Distance Correlationcited by 3
- 2025Evidential Deep Learning for Uncertainty Quantification and Out-of-Distribution Detection in Jet Identification using Deep Neural Networkscited by 3
- 2022Interpretability of an Interaction Network for identifying H rightarrow bbarb jetscited by 0
- 2026Dissecting Jet-Tagger Through Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 0
- 2026Dissecting Jet-Tagger Through Mechanistic Interpretability11 May 2026
- 2025Interpretable Machine Learning in Physics: A Review30 Mar 2025
- 2025Evidential Deep Learning for Uncertainty Quantification and Out-of-Distribution Detection in Jet Identification using Deep Neural Networks10 Jan 2025
- 2022FAIR AI Models in High Energy Physics9 Dec 2022
- 2022Feature Selection with Distance Correlation30 Nov 2022
- 2022Interpretability of an Interaction Network for identifying H rightarrow bbarb jets23 Nov 2022