mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Assessing the impact of contextual information in hate speech detection

arXiv 2210.00465 ↗First posted 2 Oct 2022cs.CLcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, hate speech has gained great relevance in social networks and other virtual media because of its intensity and its relationship with violent acts against members of protected groups. Due to the great amount of content generated by users, great effort has been made in the research and development of automatic tools to aid the analysis and moderation of this speech, at least in its most threatening forms. One of the limitations of current approaches to automatic hate speech detection is the lack of context. Most studies and resources are performed on data without context; that is, isolated messages without any type of conversational context or the topic being discussed. This restricts the available information to define if a post on a social network is hateful or not. In this work, we provide a novel corpus for contextualized hate speech detection based on user responses to news posts from media outlets on Twitter. This corpus was collected in the Rioplatense dialectal variety of Spanish and focuses on hate speech associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. Classification experiments using state-of-the-art techniques show evidence that adding contextual information improves hate speech detection performance for two proposed tasks (binary and multi-label prediction). We make our code, models, and corpus available for further research.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2022.

Builds on

22 of 71 references.

References · 22

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  4. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  5. 2019BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text miningcited by 1,935
  6. 2020Don't Stop Pretraining: Adapt Language Models to Domains and Taskscited by 1,548
  7. 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 724
  8. 2015Bidirectional LSTM-CRF Models for Sequence Taggingcited by 544
  9. 2020BERTweet: A pre-trained language model for English Tweetscited by 346
  10. 2019Predicting the Type and Target of Offensive Posts in Social Mediacited by 268
  11. 2017Deep Learning for Hate Speech Detection in Tweetscited by 180
  12. 2017Understanding Abuse: A Typology of Abusive Language Detection Subtaskscited by 115
10 more
  1. 2020Toxicity Detection: Does Context Really Matter?cited by 93
  2. 2017Detecting Online Hate Speech Using Context Aware Modelscited by 72
  3. 2017One-step and Two-step Classification for Abusive Language Detection on Twittercited by 46
  4. 2020What the [MASK]? Making Sense of Language-Specific BERT Modelscited by 44
  5. 2018Deep Learning for Detecting Cyberbullying Across Multiple Social Media Platformscited by 37
  6. 2021MarIA: Spanish Language Modelscited by 36
  7. 2022BERTIN: Efficient Pre-Training of a Spanish Language Model using Perplexity Samplingcited by 30
  8. 2021Defining and Detecting Toxicity on Social Media: Context and Knowledge are Keycited by 29
  9. 2021RoBERTuito: a pre-trained language model for social media text in Spanishcited by 22
  10. 2019From Welcome New Gabbers to the Pittsburgh Synagogue Shooting: The Evolution of Gabcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 4.

10 papers.