mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Deep Double Descent via Smooth Interpolation

arXiv 2209.10080 ↗First posted 21 Sep 2022cs.LG stat.MLcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The ability of overparameterized deep networks to interpolate noisy data, while at the same time showing good generalization performance, has been recently characterized in terms of the double descent curve for the test error. Common intuition from polynomial regression suggests that overparameterized networks are able to sharply interpolate noisy data, without considerably deviating from the ground-truth signal, thus preserving generalization ability. At present, a precise characterization of the relationship between interpolation and generalization for deep networks is missing. In this work, we quantify sharpness of fit of the training data interpolated by neural network functions, by studying the loss landscape w.r.t. to the input variable locally to each training point, over volumes around cleanly- and noisily-labelled training samples, as we systematically increase the number of model parameters and training epochs. Our findings show that loss sharpness in the input space follows both model- and epoch-wise double descent, with worse peaks observed around noisy labels. While small interpolating models sharply fit both clean and noisy data, large interpolating models express a smooth loss landscape, where noisy targets are predicted over large volumes around training data points, in contrast to existing intuition.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Sep 2022.

Builds on

45 of 56 references.

References · 45

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  3. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  4. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
  5. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
  6. 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,404
  7. 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,337
  8. 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 919
  9. 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 669
  10. 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 667
  11. 2019Benign Overfitting in Linear Regressioncited by 544
  12. 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 504
33 more
  1. 2017Sharp Minima Can Generalize For Deep Netscited by 462
  2. 2014In Search of the Real Inductive Bias: On the Role of Implicit Regularization in Deep Learningcited by 339
  3. 2021The Intrinsic Dimension of Images and Its Impact on Learningcited by 307
  4. 2019Model Fusion via Optimal Transportcited by 217
  5. 2015Convergent Learning: Do different neural networks learn the same representations?cited by 215
  6. 2019Two models of double descent for weak featurescited by 194
  7. 2018Sensitivity and Generalization in Neural Networks: an Empirical Studycited by 187
  8. 2018Robustness via curvature regularization, and vice versacited by 174
  9. 2021A Universal Law of Robustness via Isoperimetrycited by 150
  10. 2018Towards Understanding the Role of Over-Parametrization in Generalization of Neural Networkscited by 140
  11. 2022Understanding Gradient Descent on Edge of Stability in Deep Learningcited by 126
  12. 2021Geometry of the Loss Landscape in Overparameterized Neural Networks: Symmetries and Invariancescited by 125
  13. 2019Implicit regularization for deep neural networks driven by an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck like processcited by 123
  14. 2019Harmless interpolation of noisy data in regressioncited by 121
  15. 2018Predicting the Generalization Gap in Deep Networks with Margin Distributionscited by 111
  16. 2020Rethinking Bias-Variance Trade-off for Generalization of Neural Networkscited by 107
  17. 2021What Happens after SGD Reaches Zero Loss? --A Mathematical Frameworkcited by 106
  18. 2018Overfitting or perfect fitting? Risk bounds for classification and regression rules that interpolatecited by 99
  19. 2013Deep Learning of Representations: Looking Forwardcited by 84
  20. 2018A Modern Take on the Bias-Variance Tradeoff in Neural Networkscited by 64
  21. 2019Explaining Landscape Connectivity of Low-cost Solutions for Multilayer Netscited by 63
  22. 2021Stochastic Training is Not Necessary for Generalizationcited by 63
  23. 2018The jamming transition as a paradigm to understand the loss landscape of deep neural networkscited by 61
  24. 2021On Linear Stability of SGD and Input-Smoothness of Neural Networkscited by 61
  25. 2022Can Neural Nets Learn the Same Model Twice? Investigating Reproducibility and Double Descent from the Decision Boundary Perspectivecited by 57
  26. 2019Let's Agree to Agree: Neural Networks Share Classification Order on Real Datasetscited by 55
  27. 2020A case for new neural network smoothness constraintscited by 43
  28. 2020Provable Benefits of Overparameterization in Model Compression: From Double Descent to Pruning Neural Networkscited by 40
  29. 2019How to Initialize your Network? Robust Initialization for WeightNorm & ResNetscited by 36
  30. 2022Implicit Regularization or Implicit Conditioning? Exact Risk Trajectories of SGD in High Dimensionscited by 23
  31. 2022Are All Linear Regions Created Equal?cited by 13
  32. 2018Curvature-based Comparison of Two Neural Networkscited by 6
  33. 2020Hyperplane Arrangements of Trained ConvNets Are Biasedcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

8 papers.