Optimizing the Performative Risk under Weak Convexity Assumptions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In performative prediction, a predictive model impacts the distribution that generates future data, a phenomenon that is being ignored in classical supervised learning. In this closed-loop setting, the natural measure of performance named performative risk (PR), captures the expected loss incurred by a predictive model after deployment. The core difficulty of using the performative risk as an optimization objective is that the data distribution itself depends on the model parameters. This dependence is governed by the environment and not under the control of the learner. As a consequence, even the choice of a convex loss function can result in a highly non-convex PR minimization problem. Prior work has identified a pair of general conditions on the loss and the mapping from model parameters to distributions that implies the convexity of the performative risk. In this paper, we relax these assumptions and focus on obtaining weaker notions of convexity, without sacrificing the amenability of the PR minimization problem for iterative optimization methods.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2022.
Builds on
28 of 43 references.
References · 28
- 2016Linear Convergence of Gradient and Proximal-Gradient Methods Under the Polyak-Lojasiewicz Conditioncited by 526
- 2020Performative Predictioncited by 318
- 2015Strategic Classificationcited by 256
- 2020Loss landscapes and optimization in over-parameterized non-linear systems and neural networkscited by 231
- 2019Solving a Class of Non-Convex Min-Max Games Using Iterative First Order Methodscited by 148
- 2018Fast and Faster Convergence of SGD for Over-Parameterized Models and an Accelerated Perceptroncited by 143
- 2020Stochastic Polyak Step-size for SGD: An Adaptive Learning Rate for Fast Convergencecited by 137
- 2018Differentially Private Empirical Risk Minimization Revisited: Faster and More Generalcited by 127
- 2021Outside the Echo Chamber: Optimizing the Performative Riskcited by 95
- 2020Stochastic Optimization for Performative Predictioncited by 92
- 2020Performative Prediction in a Stateful Worldcited by 90
- 2021How to Learn when Data Reacts to Your Model: Performative Gradient Descentcited by 70
16 more
- 2020Causal Strategic Linear Regressioncited by 65
- 2020Stochastic optimization with decision-dependent distributionscited by 65
- 2016Error bounds, quadratic growth, and linear convergence of proximal methodscited by 59
- 2021A Local Convergence Theory for Mildly Over-Parameterized Two-Layer Neural Networkcited by 47
- 2021Alternative Microfoundations for Strategic Classificationcited by 47
- 2020Decisions, Counterfactual Explanations and Strategic Behaviorcited by 44
- 2015From error bounds to the complexity of first-order descent methods for convex functionscited by 42
- 2022Regret Minimization with Performative Feedbackcited by 40
- 2021State Dependent Performative Prediction with Stochastic Approximationcited by 38
- 2021Stateful Strategic Regressioncited by 32
- 2013An Asynchronous Parallel Stochastic Coordinate Descent Algorithmcited by 26
- 2013Gradient methods for convex minimization: better rates under weaker conditionscited by 21
- 2014Asynchronous Stochastic Coordinate Descent: Parallelism and Convergence Propertiescited by 21
- 2021Online Projected Gradient Descent for Stochastic Optimization with Decision-Dependent Distributionscited by 17
- 2015The restricted strong convexity revisited: Analysis of equivalence to error bound and quadratic growthcited by 4
- 2021Online Stochastic Optimization for Unknown Linear Systems: Data-Driven Synthesis and Controller Analysiscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2024Addressing Polarization and Unfairness in Performative Predictioncited by 11
- 2024ProFL: Performative Robust Optimal Federated Learningcited by 1
- 2026When Predictions Shape Reality: A Socio-Technical Synthesis of Performative Predictions in Machine Learningcited by 0
- 2026When and How Human Curation Backfires: Preference Alignment under Multi-Model Self-Consuming Loopcited by 0
- 2026When and How Human Curation Backfires: Preference Alignment under Multi-Model Self-Consuming Loop28 May 2026
- 2026When Predictions Shape Reality: A Socio-Technical Synthesis of Performative Predictions in Machine Learning7 Jan 2026
- 2024ProFL: Performative Robust Optimal Federated Learning23 Oct 2024
- 2024Addressing Polarization and Unfairness in Performative Prediction24 Jun 2024