mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Gradient methods for convex minimization: better rates under weaker conditions

arXiv 1303.4645 ↗First posted 19 Mar 2013math.OC cs.IT cs.NAcited by 21

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The convergence behavior of gradient methods for minimizing convex differentiable functions is one of the core questions in convex optimization. This paper shows that their well-known complexities can be achieved under conditions weaker than the commonly accepted ones. We relax the common gradient Lipschitz-continuity condition and strong convexity condition to ones that hold only over certain line segments. Specifically, we establish complexities O(fracRε) and O(√fracRε) for the ordinary and accelerate gradient methods, respectively, assuming that nabla f is Lipschitz continuous with constant R over the line segment joining x and x-frac1Rnabla f for each x∈dom f. Then we improve them to O(fracRnulog(frac1ε)) and O(√fracRnulog(frac1ε)) for function f that also satisfies the secant inequality < nabla f(x), x- x^* > ≥ nu|x-x^*|2 for each x∈ dom f and its projection x^* to the minimizer set of f. The secant condition is also shown to be necessary for the geometric decay of solution error. Not only are the relaxed conditions met by more functions, the restrictions give smaller R and larger nu than they are without the restrictions and thus lead to better complexity bounds. We apply these results to sparse optimization and demonstrate a faster algorithm.

Key facts. Cited by 21 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Mar 2013.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 5; 2023: 4; 2024: 5; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

21 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2023Understanding Incremental Learning of Gradient Descent: A Fine-grained Analysis of Matrix Sensingcited by 40
  2. 2022Convergence of gradient descent for deep neural networkscited by 24
  3. 2021Proxy Convexity: A Unified Framework for the Analysis of Neural Networks Trained by Gradient Descentcited by 21
  4. 2021On the Local Linear Rate of Consensus on the Stiefel Manifoldcited by 8
  5. 2021Why Do Local Methods Solve Nonconvex Problems?cited by 8
  6. 2023No Wrong Turns: The Simple Geometry Of Neural Networks Optimization Pathscited by 7
  7. 2024Loss Landscape Characterization of Neural Networks without Over-Parametrizationcited by 7
  8. 2024Locally Differentially Private Online Federated Learning With Correlated Noisecited by 6
  9. 2022Sampling Attacks on Meta Reinforcement Learning: A Minimax Formulation and Complexity Analysiscited by 5
  10. 2022Optimizing the Performative Risk under Weak Convexity Assumptionscited by 4
  11. 2023Differentially Private Non-Convex Optimization under the KL Condition with Optimal Ratescited by 4
  12. 2024From Inverse Optimization to Feasibility to ERMcited by 3
9 more
  1. 2025Learning to optimize with guarantees: a complete characterization of linearly convergent algorithmscited by 3
  2. 2025Glocal Smoothness: Line search and adaptive step sizes can help in theory too!cited by 2
  3. 2022Spectral Regularization Allows Data-frugal Learning over Combinatorial Spacescited by 1
  4. 2022A Local Convergence Theory for the Stochastic Gradient Descent Method in Non-Convex Optimization With Non-isolated Local Minimacited by 0
  5. 2023A Homogenization Approach for Gradient-Dominated Stochastic Optimizationcited by 0
  6. 2024Differentially Private Online Federated Learning with Correlated Noisecited by 0
  7. 2024Faster Convergence of Stochastic Accelerated Gradient Descent under Interpolationcited by 0
  8. 2025Decreasing Entropic Regularization Averaged Gradient for Semi-Discrete Optimal Transportcited by 0
  9. 2026Retraction-Free Optimization over the Stiefel Manifold for the LoRA Fine-Tuningcited by 0