mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Evaluating Point Cloud from Moving Camera Videos: A No-Reference Metric

arXiv 2208.14085 ↗First posted 30 Aug 2022cs.CV eess.IVcited by 22

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Point cloud is one of the most widely used digital representation formats for three-dimensional (3D) contents, the visual quality of which may suffer from noise and geometric shift distortions during the production procedure as well as compression and downsampling distortions during the transmission process. To tackle the challenge of point cloud quality assessment (PCQA), many PCQA methods have been proposed to evaluate the visual quality levels of point clouds by assessing the rendered static 2D projections. Although such projection-based PCQA methods achieve competitive performance with the assistance of mature image quality assessment (IQA) methods, they neglect that the 3D model is also perceived in a dynamic viewing manner, where the viewpoint is continually changed according to the feedback of the rendering device. Therefore, in this paper, we evaluate the point clouds from moving camera videos and explore the way of dealing with PCQA tasks via using video quality assessment (VQA) methods. First, we generate the captured videos by rotating the camera around the point clouds through several circular pathways. Then we extract both spatial and temporal quality-aware features from the selected key frames and the video clips through using trainable 2D-CNN and pre-trained 3D-CNN models respectively. Finally, the visual quality of point clouds is represented by the video quality values. The experimental results reveal that the proposed method is effective for predicting the visual quality levels of the point clouds and even competitive with full-reference (FR) PCQA methods. The ablation studies further verify the rationality of the proposed framework and confirm the contributions made by the quality-aware features extracted via the dynamic viewing manner. The code is available at https://github.com/zzc-1998/VQA_PC.

Key facts. Cited by 22 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Aug 2022.

Builds on

16 of 63 references.

References · 16

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  4. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,795
  5. 2017The Kinetics Human Action Video Datasetcited by 1,909
  6. 2018SlowFast Networks for Video Recognitioncited by 1,867
  7. 2018Open3D: A Modern Library for 3D Data Processingcited by 721
  8. 2019Quality Assessment of In-the-Wild Videoscited by 164
  9. 2022A Deep Learning based No-reference Quality Assessment Model for UGC Videoscited by 129
  10. 2021RAPIQUE: Rapid and Accurate Video Quality Prediction of User Generated Contentcited by 100
  11. 2020Inferring Point Cloud Quality via Graph Similaritycited by 58
  12. 2020Point Cloud Quality Assessment: Dataset Construction and Learning-based No-Reference Metriccited by 53
4 more
  1. 2021MPED: Quantifying Point Cloud Distortion based on Multiscale Potential Energy Discrepancycited by 28
  2. 2022A No-reference Quality Assessment Metric for Point Cloud Based on Captured Video Sequencescited by 24
  3. 2019Point Cloud Rendering after Coding: Impacts on Subjective and Objective Qualitycited by 23
  4. 2021Subjective and Objective Visual Quality Assessment of Textured 3D Meshescited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 6; 2024: 7; 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

22 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022MM-PCQA: Multi-Modal Learning for No-reference Point Cloud Quality Assessmentcited by 39
  2. 2024Q-Bench-Video: Benchmarking the Video Quality Understanding of LMMscited by 39
  3. 2023Advancing Zero-Shot Digital Human Quality Assessment through Text-Prompted Evaluationcited by 27
  4. 2024Quality Assessment in the Era of Large Models: A Surveycited by 26
  5. 2023GMS-3DQA: Projection-based Grid Mini-patch Sampling for 3D Model Quality Assessmentcited by 21
  6. 2024Enhancing Blind Video Quality Assessment with Rich Quality-aware Featurescited by 19
  7. 2022Perceptual Quality Assessment for Digital Human Headscited by 13
  8. 2022DDH-QA: A Dynamic Digital Humans Quality Assessment Databasecited by 9
  9. 2023EEP-3DQA: Efficient and Effective Projection-based 3D Model Quality Assessmentcited by 8
  10. 2024Dual-Branch Network for Portrait Image Quality Assessmentcited by 8
  11. 2023Geometry-Aware Video Quality Assessment for Dynamic Digital Humancited by 7
  12. 2023A No-Reference Quality Assessment Method for Digital Human Headcited by 6
10 more
  1. 2023Simple Baselines for Projection-based Full-reference and No-reference Point Cloud Quality Assessmentcited by 5
  2. 2026SeGPruner: Semantic-Geometric Visual Token Pruner for 3D Question Answeringcited by 3
  3. 2024Asynchronous Feedback Network for Perceptual Point Cloud Quality Assessmentcited by 2
  4. 2024Learning Disentangled Representations for Perceptual Point Cloud Quality Assessment via Mutual Information Minimizationcited by 2
  5. 2025Multi-Dimensional Quality Assessment for Text-to-3D Assets: Dataset and Modelcited by 2
  6. 2025From Images to Point Clouds: An Efficient Solution for Cross-media Blind Quality Assessment without Annotated Trainingcited by 1
  7. 2025Low-Complexity Patch-based No-Reference Point Cloud Quality Metric exploiting Weighted Structure and Texture Featurescited by 1
  8. 2025Point Cloud Compression and Objective Quality Assessment: A Surveycited by 1
  9. 2024Perceptual Quality Assessment of Trisoup-Lifting Encoded 3D Point Cloudscited by 0
  10. 2025Differentiable Low-computation Global Correlation Loss for Monotonicity Evaluation in Quality Assessmentcited by 0