Reducing Exploitability with Population Based Training
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Self-play reinforcement learning has achieved state-of-the-art, and often superhuman, performance in a variety of zero-sum games. Yet prior work has found that policies that are highly capable against regular opponents can fail catastrophically against adversarial policies: an opponent trained explicitly against the victim. Prior defenses using adversarial training were able to make the victim robust to a specific adversary, but the victim remained vulnerable to new ones. We conjecture this limitation was due to insufficient diversity of adversaries seen during training. We analyze a defense using population based training to pit the victim against a diverse set of opponents. We evaluate this defense's robustness against new adversaries in two low-dimensional environments. This defense increases robustness against adversaries, as measured by the number of attacker training timesteps to exploit the victim. Furthermore, we show that robustness is correlated with the size of the opponent population.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Aug 2022.
Builds on
17 of 29 references.
References · 17
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,519
- 2019Dota 2 with Large Scale Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,084
- 2017Ray: A Distributed Framework for Emerging AI Applicationscited by 516
- 2017Population Based Training of Neural Networkscited by 351
- 2017Adversarial Attacks on Neural Network Policiescited by 314
- 2017A Unified Game-Theoretic Approach to Multiagent Reinforcement Learningcited by 265
- 2018Human-level performance in first-person multiplayer games with population-based deep reinforcement learningcited by 260
- 2017Emergence of Grounded Compositional Language in Multi-Agent Populationscited by 257
- 2019Adversarial Policies: Attacking Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 209
5 more
- 2017Emergent Complexity via Multi-Agent Competitioncited by 117
- 2017Delving into adversarial attacks on deep policiescited by 104
- 2019Open-ended Learning in Symmetric Zero-sum Gamescited by 96
- 2020Robust Reinforcement Learning using Adversarial Populationscited by 64
- 2021ARC: Adversarially Robust Control Policies for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2022Adversarial Policies Beat Superhuman Go AIscited by 29
- 2022Red Teaming with Mind Reading: White-Box Adversarial Policies Against RL Agentscited by 1
- 2023Quantifying Assistive Robustness Via the Natural-Adversarial Frontiercited by 1
- 2025DiffFP: Learning Behaviors from Scratch via Diffusion-based Fictitious Playcited by 0
- 2025DiffFP: Learning Behaviors from Scratch via Diffusion-based Fictitious Play17 Nov 2025
- 2023Quantifying Assistive Robustness Via the Natural-Adversarial Frontier16 Oct 2023
- 2022Adversarial Policies Beat Superhuman Go AIs1 Nov 2022
- 2022Red Teaming with Mind Reading: White-Box Adversarial Policies Against RL Agents5 Sep 2022