mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

RadSegNet: A Reliable Approach to Radar Camera Fusion

arXiv 2208.03849 ↗First posted 8 Aug 2022cs.CV cs.AIcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Perception systems for autonomous driving have seen significant advancements in their performance over last few years. However, these systems struggle to show robustness in extreme weather conditions because sensors like lidars and cameras, which are the primary sensors in a sensor suite, see a decline in performance under these conditions. In order to solve this problem, camera-radar fusion systems provide a unique opportunity for all weather reliable high quality perception. Cameras provides rich semantic information while radars can work through occlusions and in all weather conditions. In this work, we show that the state-of-the-art fusion methods perform poorly when camera input is degraded, which essentially results in losing the all-weather reliability they set out to achieve. Contrary to these approaches, we propose a new method, RadSegNet, that uses a new design philosophy of independent information extraction and truly achieves reliability in all conditions, including occlusions and adverse weather. We develop and validate our proposed system on the benchmark Astyx dataset and further verify these results on the RADIATE dataset. When compared to state-of-the-art methods, RadSegNet achieves a 27% improvement on Astyx and 41.46% increase on RADIATE, in average precision score and maintains a significantly better performance in adverse weather conditions

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Aug 2022.

Builds on

23 of 38 references.

References · 23

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
  3. 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,210
  4. 2015SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detectorcited by 3,125
  5. 2017Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 2,154
  6. 2018PointPillars: Fast Encoders for Object Detection from Point Cloudscited by 1,707
  7. 2019Objects as Pointscited by 1,172
  8. 2018Pseudo-LiDAR from Visual Depth Estimation: Bridging the Gap in 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Drivingcited by 455
  9. 2019PointPainting: Sequential Fusion for 3D Object Detectioncited by 449
  10. 2017Semantic Foggy Scene Understanding with Synthetic Datacited by 401
  11. 2017Joint 3D Proposal Generation and Object Detection from View Aggregationcited by 325
  12. 2019Deep Multi-modal Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation for Autonomous Driving: Datasets, Methods, and Challengescited by 313
11 more
  1. 2020CenterFusion: Center-based Radar and Camera Fusion for 3D Object Detectioncited by 159
  2. 2019The Oxford Radar RobotCar Dataset: A Radar Extension to the Oxford RobotCar Datasetcited by 133
  3. 2020RADIATE: A Radar Dataset for Automotive Perception in Bad Weathercited by 98
  4. 2020A Deep Learning-based Radar and Camera Sensor Fusion Architecture for Object Detectioncited by 70
  5. 2019Physics-Based Rendering for Improving Robustness to Raincited by 49
  6. 2019Distant Vehicle Detection Using Radar and Visioncited by 44
  7. 2019RRPN: Radar Region Proposal Network for Object Detection in Autonomous Vehiclescited by 33
  8. 2022Pointillism: Accurate 3D bounding box estimation with multi-radarscited by 22
  9. 2020YOdar: Uncertainty-based Sensor Fusion for Vehicle Detection with Camera and Radar Sensorscited by 13
  10. 2020Radar-Camera Sensor Fusion for Joint Object Detection and Distance Estimation in Autonomous Vehiclescited by 12
  11. 2020Warping of Radar Data into Camera Image for Cross-Modal Supervision in Automotive Applicationscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

11 papers.