Binary Classification with Positive Labeling Sources
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
To create a large amount of training labels for machine learning models effectively and efficiently, researchers have turned to Weak Supervision (WS), which uses programmatic labeling sources rather than manual annotation. Existing works of WS for binary classification typically assume the presence of labeling sources that are able to assign both positive and negative labels to data in roughly balanced proportions. However, for many tasks of interest where there is a minority positive class, negative examples could be too diverse for developers to generate indicative labeling sources. Thus, in this work, we study the application of WS on binary classification tasks with positive labeling sources only. We propose WEAPO, a simple yet competitive WS method for producing training labels without negative labeling sources. On 10 benchmark datasets, we show WEAPO achieves the highest averaged performance in terms of both the quality of synthesized labels and the performance of the final classifier supervised with these labels. We incorporated the implementation of method into WRENCH, an existing benchmarking platform.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Aug 2022.
Builds on
27 of 44 references.
References · 27
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2016CVXPY: A Python-Embedded Modeling Language for Convex Optimizationcited by 641
- 2016Data Programming: Creating Large Training Sets, Quicklycited by 246
- 2018Learning from positive and unlabeled data: a surveycited by 219
- 2018Training Complex Models with Multi-Task Weak Supervisioncited by 106
- 2020Fast and Three-rious: Speeding Up Weak Supervision with Triplet Methodscited by 98
- 2021WRENCH: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Weak Supervisioncited by 96
- 2020Fine-Tuning Pre-trained Language Model with Weak Supervision: A Contrastive-Regularized Self-Training Approachcited by 83
- 2022A Survey on Programmatic Weak Supervisioncited by 66
- 2018Snorkel DryBell: A Case Study in Deploying Weak Supervision at Industrial Scalecited by 52
- 2020Named Entity Recognition without Labelled Data: A Weak Supervision Approachcited by 46
- 2020Denoising Multi-Source Weak Supervision for Neural Text Classificationcited by 42
15 more
- 2019Cross-Modal Data Programming Enables Rapid Medical Machine Learningcited by 32
- 2019Scene Graph Prediction with Limited Labelscited by 32
- 2017SwellShark: A Generative Model for Biomedical Named Entity Recognition without Labeled Datacited by 28
- 2019NERO: A Neural Rule Grounding Framework for Label-Efficient Relation Extractioncited by 24
- 2020Leveraging Multi-Source Weak Social Supervision for Early Detection of Fake Newscited by 24
- 2019Learning to Contextually Aggregate Multi-Source Supervision for Sequence Labelingcited by 22
- 2019GOGGLES: Automatic Image Labeling with Affinity Codingcited by 19
- 2020Ontology-driven weak supervision for clinical entity classification in electronic health recordscited by 18
- 2019Multi-Resolution Weak Supervision for Sequential Datacited by 17
- 2020Learning with Weak Supervision for Email Intent Detectioncited by 17
- 2021BERTifying the Hidden Markov Model for Multi-Source Weakly Supervised Named Entity Recognitioncited by 15
- 2019Rekall: Specifying Video Events using Compositions of Spatiotemporal Labelscited by 14
- 2021Creating Training Sets via Weak Indirect Supervisioncited by 14
- 2017Heterogeneous Supervision for Relation Extraction: A Representation Learning Approachcited by 9
- 2022Understanding Programmatic Weak Supervision via Source-aware Influence Functioncited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
2 papers.