mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

GOGGLES: Automatic Image Labeling with Affinity Coding

arXiv 1903.04552 ↗First posted 11 Mar 2019cs.CV cs.DBcited by 19

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generating large labeled training data is becoming the biggest bottleneck in building and deploying supervised machine learning models. Recently, the data programming paradigm has been proposed to reduce the human cost in labeling training data. However, data programming relies on designing labeling functions which still requires significant domain expertise. Also, it is prohibitively difficult to write labeling functions for image datasets as it is hard to express domain knowledge using raw features for images (pixels). We propose affinity coding, a new domain-agnostic paradigm for automated training data labeling. The core premise of affinity coding is that the affinity scores of instance pairs belonging to the same class on average should be higher than those of pairs belonging to different classes, according to some affinity functions. We build the GOGGLES system that implements affinity coding for labeling image datasets by designing a novel set of reusable affinity functions for images, and propose a novel hierarchical generative model for class inference using a small development set. We compare GOGGLES with existing data programming systems on 5 image labeling tasks from diverse domains. GOGGLES achieves labeling accuracies ranging from a minimum of 71% to a maximum of 98% without requiring any extensive human annotation. In terms of end-to-end performance, GOGGLES outperforms the state-of-the-art data programming system Snuba by 21% and a state-of-the-art few-shot learning technique by 5%, and is only 7% away from the fully supervised upper bound.

Key facts. Cited by 19 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Mar 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 6; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

19 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021WRENCH: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Weak Supervisioncited by 96
  2. 2021OmniFair: A Declarative System for Model-Agnostic Group Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 18
  3. 2021DP-SSL: Towards Robust Semi-supervised Learning with A Few Labeled Samplescited by 18
  4. 2022Learning Hyper Label Model for Programmatic Weak Supervisioncited by 16
  5. 2022Nemo: Guiding and Contextualizing Weak Supervision for Interactive Data Programmingcited by 10
  6. 2024The ALCHEmist: Automated Labeling 500x CHEaper Than LLM Data Annotatorscited by 10
  7. 2022AutoWS-Bench-101: Benchmarking Automated Weak Supervision with 100 Labelscited by 7
  8. 2022Ground Truth Inference for Weakly Supervised Entity Matchingcited by 5
  9. 2023Rapid Image Labeling via Neuro-Symbolic Learningcited by 4
  10. 2021Zeus: Efficiently Localizing Actions in Videos using Reinforcement Learningcited by 3
  11. 2025ScriptoriumWS: A Code Generation Assistant for Weak Supervisioncited by 3
  12. 2025A Cost-Effective LLM-based Approach to Identify Wildlife Trafficking in Online Marketplacescited by 3
7 more
  1. 2021CHEF: A Cheap and Fast Pipeline for Iteratively Cleaning Label Uncertainties (Technical Report)cited by 2
  2. 2022Binary Classification with Positive Labeling Sourcescited by 2
  3. 2025RBT4DNN: Requirements-based Testing of Neural Networkscited by 2
  4. 2022Label Augmentation with Reinforced Labeling for Weak Supervisioncited by 1
  5. 2024Automating Weak Label Generation for Data Programming with Clinicians in the Loopcited by 1
  6. 2025Reliable Programmatic Weak Supervision with Confidence Intervals for Label Probabilitiescited by 1
  7. 2026Structured Exploration and Exploitation of Label Functions for Automated Data Annotationcited by 1