mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning with Weak Supervision for Email Intent Detection

arXiv 2005.13084 ↗First posted 26 May 2020cs.CLcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Email remains one of the most frequently used means of online communication. People spend a significant amount of time every day on emails to exchange information, manage tasks and schedule events. Previous work has studied different ways for improving email productivity by prioritizing emails, suggesting automatic replies or identifying intents to recommend appropriate actions. The problem has been mostly posed as a supervised learning problem where models of different complexities were proposed to classify an email message into a predefined taxonomy of intents or classes. The need for labeled data has always been one of the largest bottlenecks in training supervised models. This is especially the case for many real-world tasks, such as email intent classification, where large scale annotated examples are either hard to acquire or unavailable due to privacy or data access constraints. Email users often take actions in response to intents expressed in an email (e.g., setting up a meeting in response to an email with a scheduling request). Such actions can be inferred from user interaction logs. In this paper, we propose to leverage user actions as a source of weak supervision, in addition to a limited set of annotated examples, to detect intents in emails. We develop an end-to-end robust deep neural network model for email intent identification that leverages both clean annotated data and noisy weak supervision along with a self-paced learning mechanism. Extensive experiments on three different intent detection tasks show that our approach can effectively leverage the weakly supervised data to improve intent detection in emails.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 May 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 7; 2022: 3; 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

17 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021WRENCH: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Weak Supervisioncited by 95
  2. 2021Weakly-supervised Text Classification Based on Keyword Graphcited by 25
  3. 2024TELEClass: Taxonomy Enrichment and LLM-Enhanced Hierarchical Text Classification with Minimal Supervisioncited by 25
  4. 2021Goldilocks: Just-Right Tuning of BERT for Technology-Assisted Reviewcited by 11
  5. 2021Knodle: Modular Weakly Supervised Learning with PyTorchcited by 7
  6. 2022PromptDA: Label-guided Data Augmentation for Prompt-based Few-shot Learnerscited by 7
  7. 2023PIEClass: Weakly-Supervised Text Classification with Prompting and Noise-Robust Iterative Ensemble Trainingcited by 6
  8. 2023MEGClass: Extremely Weakly Supervised Text Classification via Mutually-Enhancing Text Granularitiescited by 4
  9. 2024LabelAId: Just-in-time AI Interventions for Improving Human Labeling Quality and Domain Knowledge in Crowdsourcing Systemscited by 4
  10. 2023XAI-CLASS: Explanation-Enhanced Text Classification with Extremely Weak Supervisioncited by 3
  11. 2022Binary Classification with Positive Labeling Sourcescited by 2
  12. 2021WALNUT: A Benchmark on Semi-weakly Supervised Learning for Natural Language Understandingcited by 1
5 more
  1. 2022Adapting Task-Oriented Dialogue Models for Email Conversationscited by 1
  2. 2023Uncertainty-Aware Reward-based Deep Reinforcement Learning for Intent Analysis of Social Media Informationcited by 1
  3. 2021MetaXT: Meta Cross-Task Transfer between Disparate Label Spacescited by 0
  4. 2021Classifying Emails into Human vs Machine Categorycited by 0
  5. 2026TEAMMix: Taxonomy Enrichment Augmentation and Minority-augmented Mixing Strategy for LLM-enhanced Weak-Supervised Hierarchical Text Classificationcited by 0