mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Models Out of Line: A Fourier Lens on Distribution Shift Robustness

arXiv 2207.04075 ↗First posted 8 Jul 2022cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Improving the accuracy of deep neural networks (DNNs) on out-of-distribution (OOD) data is critical to an acceptance of deep learning (DL) in real world applications. It has been observed that accuracies on in-distribution (ID) versus OOD data follow a linear trend and models that outperform this baseline are exceptionally rare (and referred to as "effectively robust"). Recently, some promising approaches have been developed to improve OOD robustness: model pruning, data augmentation, and ensembling or zero-shot evaluating large pretrained models. However, there still is no clear understanding of the conditions on OOD data and model properties that are required to observe effective robustness. We approach this issue by conducting a comprehensive empirical study of diverse approaches that are known to impact OOD robustness on a broad range of natural and synthetic distribution shifts of CIFAR-10 and ImageNet. In particular, we view the "effective robustness puzzle" through a Fourier lens and ask how spectral properties of both models and OOD data influence the corresponding effective robustness. We find this Fourier lens offers some insight into why certain robust models, particularly those from the CLIP family, achieve OOD robustness. However, our analysis also makes clear that no known metric is consistently the best explanation (or even a strong explanation) of OOD robustness. Thus, to aid future research into the OOD puzzle, we address the gap in publicly-available models with effective robustness by introducing a set of pretrained models--RobustNets--with varying levels of OOD robustness.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2022.

Builds on

46 of 59 references.

References · 46

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  4. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  5. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
  6. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
  7. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
  8. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  9. 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,540
  10. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,250
  11. 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 1,998
  12. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
34 more
  1. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
  2. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
  3. 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,321
  4. 2018ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Designcited by 1,132
  5. 2016SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model sizecited by 1,054
  6. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,010
  7. 2018MnasNet: Platform-Aware Neural Architecture Search for Mobilecited by 937
  8. 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 897
  9. 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 785
  10. 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 659
  11. 2017To prune, or not to prune: exploring the efficacy of pruning for model compressioncited by 596
  12. 2019Fantastic Generalization Measures and Where to Find Themcited by 507
  13. 2019A Fourier Perspective on Model Robustness in Computer Visioncited by 288
  14. 2014One weird trick for parallelizing convolutional neural networkscited by 264
  15. 2021Accuracy on the Line: On the Strong Correlation Between Out-of-Distribution and In-Distribution Generalizationcited by 248
  16. 2020Comparing Rewinding and Fine-tuning in Neural Network Pruningcited by 238
  17. 2019What's Hidden in a Randomly Weighted Neural Network?cited by 236
  18. 2018Do CIFAR-10 Classifiers Generalize to CIFAR-10?cited by 197
  19. 2018Training behavior of deep neural network in frequency domaincited by 174
  20. 2019What Do Compressed Deep Neural Networks Forget?cited by 164
  21. 2019The Convergence Rate of Neural Networks for Learned Functions of Different Frequenciescited by 134
  22. 2019Robust Learning with Jacobian Regularizationcited by 127
  23. 2021Predicting with Confidence on Unseen Distributionscited by 116
  24. 2020On Robustness and Transferability of Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 98
  25. 2020In Search of Robust Measures of Generalizationcited by 79
  26. 2021The Evolution of Out-of-Distribution Robustness Throughout Fine-Tuningcited by 74
  27. 2021On the effectiveness of adversarial training against common corruptionscited by 71
  28. 2021Amplitude-Phase Recombination: Rethinking Robustness of Convolutional Neural Networks in Frequency Domaincited by 70
  29. 2021A Winning Hand: Compressing Deep Networks Can Improve Out-Of-Distribution Robustnesscited by 62
  30. 2019Do Image Classifiers Generalize Across Time?cited by 59
  31. 2021Multi-Prize Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Accurate Binary Neural Networks by Pruning A Randomly Weighted Networkcited by 55
  32. 2021Spectral Bias in Practice: The Role of Function Frequency in Generalizationcited by 36
  33. 2020Hold me tight! Influence of discriminative features on deep network boundariescited by 31
  34. 2021Certified Adversarial Defenses Meet Out-of-Distribution Corruptions: Benchmarking Robustness and Simple Baselinescited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.