mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

D-CIPHER: Discovery of Closed-form Partial Differential Equations

arXiv 2206.10586 ↗First posted 21 Jun 2022cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Closed-form differential equations, including partial differential equations and higher-order ordinary differential equations, are one of the most important tools used by scientists to model and better understand natural phenomena. Discovering these equations directly from data is challenging because it requires modeling relationships between various derivatives that are not observed in the data (equation-data mismatch) and it involves searching across a huge space of possible equations. Current approaches make strong assumptions about the form of the equation and thus fail to discover many well-known systems. Moreover, many of them resolve the equation-data mismatch by estimating the derivatives, which makes them inadequate for noisy and infrequently sampled systems. To this end, we propose D-CIPHER, which is robust to measurement artifacts and can uncover a new and very general class of differential equations. We further design a novel optimization procedure, CoLLie, to help D-CIPHER search through this class efficiently. Finally, we demonstrate empirically that it can discover many well-known equations that are beyond the capabilities of current methods.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2022.

Builds on

21 of 62 references.

References · 21

  1. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,733
  2. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
  3. 2019AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regressioncited by 536
  4. 2017PDE-Net: Learning PDEs from Datacited by 304
  5. 2019Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradientscited by 294
  6. 2017Hidden Physics Models: Machine Learning of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equationscited by 208
  7. 2018PDE-Net 2.0: Learning PDEs from Data with A Numeric-Symbolic Hybrid Deep Networkcited by 208
  8. 2018When Gaussian Process Meets Big Data: A Review of Scalable GPscited by 205
  9. 2021Neural Symbolic Regression that Scalescited by 185
  10. 2017OSQP: An Operator Splitting Solver for Quadratic Programscited by 156
  11. 2020Weak SINDy For Partial Differential Equationscited by 154
  12. 2020AI Feynman 2.0: Pareto-optimal symbolic regression exploiting graph modularitycited by 140
9 more
  1. 2020SINDy-PI: A Robust Algorithm for Parallel Implicit Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Dynamicscited by 125
  2. 2021PySINDy: A comprehensive Python package for robust sparse system identificationcited by 88
  3. 2017Sparse learning of stochastic dynamic equationscited by 76
  4. 2017Numerical Gaussian Processes for Time-dependent and Non-linear Partial Differential Equationscited by 72
  5. 2020DLGA-PDE: Discovery of PDEs with incomplete candidate library via combination of deep learning and genetic algorithmcited by 45
  6. 2019DL-PDE: Deep-learning based data-driven discovery of partial differential equations from discrete and noisy datacited by 38
  7. 2021Any equation is a forest: Symbolic genetic algorithm for discovering open-form partial differential equations (SGA-PDE)cited by 38
  8. 2022Discovering Nonlinear PDEs from Scarce Data with Physics-encoded Learningcited by 24
  9. 2020Learning outside the Black-Box: The pursuit of interpretable modelscited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

7 papers.