mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

No Equations Needed: Learning System Dynamics Without Relying on Closed-Form ODEs

arXiv 2501.18563 ↗First posted 30 Jan 2025cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data-driven modeling of dynamical systems is a crucial area of machine learning. In many scenarios, a thorough understanding of the model's behavior becomes essential for practical applications. For instance, understanding the behavior of a pharmacokinetic model, constructed as part of drug development, may allow us to both verify its biological plausibility (e.g., the drug concentration curve is non-negative and decays to zero) and to design dosing guidelines. Discovery of closed-form ordinary differential equations (ODEs) can be employed to obtain such insights by finding a compact mathematical equation and then analyzing it (a two-step approach). However, its widespread use is currently hindered because the analysis process may be time-consuming, requiring substantial mathematical expertise, or even impossible if the equation is too complex. Moreover, if the found equation's behavior does not satisfy the requirements, editing it or influencing the discovery algorithms to rectify it is challenging as the link between the symbolic form of an ODE and its behavior can be elusive. This paper proposes a conceptual shift to modeling low-dimensional dynamical systems by departing from the traditional two-step modeling process. Instead of first discovering a closed-form equation and then analyzing it, our approach, direct semantic modeling, predicts the semantic representation of the dynamical system (i.e., description of its behavior) directly from data, bypassing the need for complex post-hoc analysis. This direct approach also allows the incorporation of intuitive inductive biases into the optimization algorithm and editing the model's behavior directly, ensuring that the model meets the desired specifications. Our approach not only simplifies the modeling pipeline but also enhances the transparency and flexibility of the resulting models compared to traditional closed-form ODEs.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jan 2025.

Builds on

17 of 57 references.

References · 17

  1. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,733
  2. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,455
  3. 2019AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regressioncited by 536
  4. 2019Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradientscited by 294
  5. 2017Hidden Physics Models: Machine Learning of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equationscited by 208
  6. 2021Neural Symbolic Regression that Scalescited by 185
  7. 2020Weak SINDy For Partial Differential Equationscited by 154
  8. 2018Learning Equations for Extrapolation and Controlcited by 151
  9. 2020AI Feynman 2.0: Pareto-optimal symbolic regression exploiting graph modularitycited by 140
  10. 2020SINDy-PI: A Robust Algorithm for Parallel Implicit Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Dynamicscited by 125
  11. 2016Extrapolation and learning equationscited by 106
  12. 2021PySINDy: A comprehensive Python package for robust sparse system identificationcited by 88
5 more
  1. 2022Learning Sparse Nonlinear Dynamics via Mixed-Integer Optimizationcited by 29
  2. 2022Neural Laplace: Learning diverse classes of differential equations in the Laplace domaincited by 24
  3. 2024ODE Discovery for Longitudinal Heterogeneous Treatment Effects Inferencecited by 12
  4. 2022D-CIPHER: Discovery of Closed-form Partial Differential Equationscited by 7
  5. 2024Shape Arithmetic Expressions: Advancing Scientific Discovery Beyond Closed-Form Equationscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.