mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Symbolic Recovery of Differential Equations: The Identifiability Problem

arXiv 2210.08342 ↗First posted 15 Oct 2022cs.LG math-ph math.MPcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Symbolic recovery of differential equations is the ambitious attempt at automating the derivation of governing equations with the use of machine learning techniques. In contrast to classical methods which assume the structure of the equation to be known and focus on the estimation of specific parameters, these algorithms aim to learn the structure and the parameters simultaneously. While the uniqueness and, therefore, the identifiability of parameters of governing equations are a well-addressed problem in the field of parameter estimation, it has not been investigated for symbolic recovery. However, this problem should be even more present in this field since the algorithms aim to cover larger spaces of governing equations. In this paper, we investigate under which conditions a solution of a differential equation does not uniquely determine the equation itself. For various classes of differential equations, we provide both necessary and sufficient conditions for a function to uniquely determine the corresponding differential equation. We then use our results to devise numerical algorithms aiming to determine whether a function solves a differential equation uniquely. Finally, we provide extensive numerical experiments showing that our algorithms can indeed guarantee the uniqueness of the learned governing differential equation, without assuming any knowledge about the analytic form of function, thereby ensuring the reliability of the learned equation.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Oct 2022.

Builds on

17 of 74 references.

References · 17

  1. 2019AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regressioncited by 536
  2. 2019Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradientscited by 294
  3. 2021Contemporary Symbolic Regression Methods and their Relative Performancecited by 209
  4. 2022End-to-end symbolic regression with transformerscited by 195
  5. 2021Neural Symbolic Regression that Scalescited by 185
  6. 2020Physics-informed learning of governing equations from scarce datacited by 167
  7. 2018Learning Equations for Extrapolation and Controlcited by 151
  8. 2020SINDy-PI: A Robust Algorithm for Parallel Implicit Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Dynamicscited by 125
  9. 2016Extrapolation and learning equationscited by 106
  10. 2019DeepMoD: Deep learning for Model Discovery in noisy datacited by 70
  11. 2022Symbolic Physics Learner: Discovering governing equations via Monte Carlo tree searchcited by 61
  12. 2020DLGA-PDE: Discovery of PDEs with incomplete candidate library via combination of deep learning and genetic algorithmcited by 45
5 more
  1. 2020Learning outside the Black-Box: The pursuit of interpretable modelscited by 17
  2. 2019Learning Partial Differential Equations from Data Using Neural Networkscited by 8
  3. 2022D-CIPHER: Discovery of Closed-form Partial Differential Equationscited by 7
  4. 2018Global Identifiability of Differential Modelscited by 3
  5. 2020Computing all identifiable functions of parameters for ODE modelscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 3.

8 papers.