mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Automatically Learning Hybrid Digital Twins of Dynamical Systems

arXiv 2410.23691 ↗First posted 31 Oct 2024cs.LGcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Digital Twins (DTs) are computational models that simulate the states and temporal dynamics of real-world systems, playing a crucial role in prediction, understanding, and decision-making across diverse domains. However, existing approaches to DTs often struggle to generalize to unseen conditions in data-scarce settings, a crucial requirement for such models. To address these limitations, our work begins by establishing the essential desiderata for effective DTs. Hybrid Digital Twins (HDTwins) represent a promising approach to address these requirements, modeling systems using a composition of both mechanistic and neural components. This hybrid architecture simultaneously leverages (partial) domain knowledge and neural network expressiveness to enhance generalization, with its modular design facilitating improved evolvability. While existing hybrid models rely on expert-specified architectures with only parameters optimized on data, textitautomatically specifying and optimizing HDTwins remains intractable due to the complex search space and the need for flexible integration of domain priors. To overcome this complexity, we propose an evolutionary algorithm (HDTwinGen) that employs Large Language Models (LLMs) to autonomously propose, evaluate, and optimize HDTwins. Specifically, LLMs iteratively generate novel model specifications, while offline tools are employed to optimize emitted parameters. Correspondingly, proposed models are evaluated and evolved based on targeted feedback, enabling the discovery of increasingly effective hybrid models. Our empirical results reveal that HDTwinGen produces generalizable, sample-efficient, and evolvable models, significantly advancing DTs' efficacy in real-world applications.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 85 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Oct 2024.

Builds on

33 of 85 references.

References · 33

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  4. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  5. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  6. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  7. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  8. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,326
  9. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
  10. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,057
  11. 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,986
  12. 2023Large Language Models as Optimizerscited by 864
21 more
  1. 2018Recurrent World Models Facilitate Policy Evolutioncited by 785
  2. 2019Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 712
  3. 2020Lagrangian Neural Networkscited by 398
  4. 2017Large-Scale Evolution of Image Classifierscited by 348
  5. 2019Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradientscited by 309
  6. 2015Deep Kalman Filterscited by 166
  7. 2020Estimating Counterfactual Treatment Outcomes over Time Through Adversarially Balanced Representationscited by 155
  8. 2024Large Language Models to Enhance Bayesian Optimizationcited by 135
  9. 2022Causal Transformer for Estimating Counterfactual Outcomescited by 123
  10. 2021Symbolic Regression via Neural-Guided Genetic Programming Population Seedingcited by 101
  11. 2017On weight initialization in deep neural networkscited by 67
  12. 2021Physics-Integrated Variational Autoencoders for Robust and Interpretable Generative Modelingcited by 59
  13. 2022Continuous-Time Modeling of Counterfactual Outcomes Using Neural Controlled Differential Equationscited by 59
  14. 2021Integrating Expert ODEs into Neural ODEs: Pharmacology and Disease Progressioncited by 48
  15. 2023Deep Generative Symbolic Regressioncited by 28
  16. 2022Neural Laplace: Learning diverse classes of differential equations in the Laplace domaincited by 24
  17. 2020DyNODE: Neural Ordinary Differential Equations for Dynamics Modeling in Continuous Controlcited by 18
  18. 2022Robust Hybrid Learning With Expert Augmentationcited by 17
  19. 2024ODE Discovery for Longitudinal Heterogeneous Treatment Effects Inferencecited by 12
  20. 2023Neural Laplace Control for Continuous-time Delayed Systemscited by 10
  21. 2022D-CIPHER: Discovery of Closed-form Partial Differential Equationscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 7; 2026: 7.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: