mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Consistent Attack: Universal Adversarial Perturbation on Embodied Vision Navigation

arXiv 2206.05751 ↗First posted 12 Jun 2022cs.LG cs.CR cs.CVcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Embodied agents in vision navigation coupled with deep neural networks have attracted increasing attention. However, deep neural networks have been shown vulnerable to malicious adversarial noises, which may potentially cause catastrophic failures in Embodied Vision Navigation. Among different adversarial noises, universal adversarial perturbations (UAP), i.e., a constant image-agnostic perturbation applied on every input frame of the agent, play a critical role in Embodied Vision Navigation since they are computation-efficient and application-practical during the attack. However, existing UAP methods ignore the system dynamics of Embodied Vision Navigation and might be sub-optimal. In order to extend UAP to the sequential decision setting, we formulate the disturbed environment under the universal noise δ, as a δ-disturbed Markov Decision Process (δ-MDP). Based on the formulation, we analyze the properties of δ-MDP and propose two novel Consistent Attack methods, named Reward UAP and Trajectory UAP, for attacking Embodied agents, which consider the dynamic of the MDP and calculate universal noises by estimating the disturbed distribution and the disturbed Q function. For various victim models, our Consistent Attack can cause a significant drop in their performance in the PointGoal task in Habitat with different datasets and different scenes. Extensive experimental results indicate that there exist serious potential risks for applying Embodied Vision Navigation methods to the real world.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2022.

Builds on

27 of 36 references.

References · 27

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  3. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  4. 2017Matterport3D: Learning from RGB-D Data in Indoor Environmentscited by 1,354
  5. 2019Habitat: A Platform for Embodied AI Researchcited by 1,163
  6. 2017AI2-THOR: An Interactive 3D Environment for Visual AIcited by 850
  7. 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 774
  8. 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 686
  9. 2018On Evaluation of Embodied Navigation Agentscited by 526
  10. 2018Gibson Env: Real-World Perception for Embodied Agentscited by 477
  11. 2020Object Goal Navigation using Goal-Oriented Semantic Explorationcited by 421
  12. 2017Adversarial Attacks on Neural Network Policiescited by 314
15 more
  1. 2020Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning against Adversarial Perturbations on State Observationscited by 235
  2. 2021Embodied Intelligence via Learning and Evolutioncited by 154
  3. 2017Grounded Language Learning in a Simulated 3D Worldcited by 100
  4. 2022Adversarial Texture for Fooling Person Detectors in the Physical Worldcited by 96
  5. 2022Protecting Facial Privacy: Generating Adversarial Identity Masks via Style-robust Makeup Transfercited by 77
  6. 2016DeepMind Labcited by 74
  7. 2020Adversarial Deepfakes: Evaluating Vulnerability of Deepfake Detectors to Adversarial Examplescited by 66
  8. 2020Towards Face Encryption by Generating Adversarial Identity Maskscited by 62
  9. 2020Understanding Adversarial Examples from the Mutual Influence of Images and Perturbationscited by 59
  10. 2021A Survey On Universal Adversarial Attackcited by 59
  11. 2017Art of singular vectors and universal adversarial perturbationscited by 49
  12. 2020Adversarial Perturbations Fool Deepfake Detectorscited by 48
  13. 2022Towards Safe Reinforcement Learning via Constraining Conditional Value-at-Riskcited by 40
  14. 2021Understanding Adversarial Attacks on Observations in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 13
  15. 2021Hierarchical and Partially Observable Goal-driven Policy Learning with Goals Relational Graphcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

6 papers.