Anomaly Detection with Test Time Augmentation and Consistency Evaluation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep neural networks are known to be vulnerable to unseen data: they may wrongly assign high confidence stcores to out-distribuion samples. Recent works try to solve the problem using representation learning methods and specific metrics. In this paper, we propose a simple, yet effective post-hoc anomaly detection algorithm named Test Time Augmentation Anomaly Detection (TTA-AD), inspired by a novel observation. Specifically, we observe that in-distribution data enjoy more consistent predictions for its original and augmented versions on a trained network than out-distribution data, which separates in-distribution and out-distribution samples. Experiments on various high-resolution image benchmark datasets demonstrate that TTA-AD achieves comparable or better detection performance under dataset-vs-dataset anomaly detection settings with a 60%~90% running time reduction of existing classifier-based algorithms. We provide empirical verification that the key to TTA-AD lies in the remaining classes between augmented features, which has long been partially ignored by previous works. Additionally, we use RUNS as a surrogate to analyze our algorithm theoretically.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2022.
Builds on
25 of 57 references.
References · 25
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,385
- 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,125
- 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,642
- 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,485
- 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
- 2015LSUN: Construction of a Large-scale Image Dataset using Deep Learning with Humans in the Loopcited by 1,355
- 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,328
13 more
- 2019Memorizing Normality to Detect Anomaly: Memory-augmented Deep Autoencoder for Unsupervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 564
- 2019Using Self-Supervised Learning Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 514
- 2020CSI: Novelty Detection via Contrastive Learning on Distributionally Shifted Instancescited by 441
- 2020Generalized ODIN: Detecting Out-of-distribution Image without Learning from Out-of-distribution Datacited by 408
- 2019Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Surveycited by 358
- 2019High Frequency Component Helps Explain the Generalization of Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 310
- 2019Deep Semi-Supervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 291
- 2018Deep Anomaly Detection Using Geometric Transformationscited by 269
- 2020Contrastive Training for Improved Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 186
- 2020From ImageNet to Image Classification: Contextualizing Progress on Benchmarkscited by 90
- 2019Exploiting Epistemic Uncertainty of Anatomy Segmentation for Anomaly Detection in Retinal OCTcited by 42
- 2019Detecting Out-of-Distribution Inputs in Deep Neural Networks Using an Early-Layer Outputcited by 20
- 2020Visual Chiralitycited by 14
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.