mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Generalization Bounds for Gradient Methods via Discrete and Continuous Prior

arXiv 2205.13799 ↗First posted 27 May 2022cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Proving algorithm-dependent generalization error bounds for gradient-type optimization methods has attracted significant attention recently in learning theory. However, most existing trajectory-based analyses require either restrictive assumptions on the learning rate (e.g., fast decreasing learning rate), or continuous injected noise (such as the Gaussian noise in Langevin dynamics). In this paper, we introduce a new discrete data-dependent prior to the PAC-Bayesian framework, and prove a high probability generalization bound of order O(frac1n· sumt=1T(γt/varepsilont)2left|gtright|2) for Floored GD (i.e. a version of gradient descent with precision level varepsilont), where n is the number of training samples, γt is the learning rate at step t, gt is roughly the difference of the gradient computed using all samples and that using only prior samples. left|gtright| is upper bounded by and and typical much smaller than the gradient norm left|nabla f(Wt)right|. We remark that our bound holds for nonconvex and nonsmooth scenarios. Moreover, our theoretical results provide numerically favorable upper bounds of testing errors (e.g., 0.037 on MNIST). Using a similar technique, we can also obtain new generalization bounds for certain variants of SGD. Furthermore, we study the generalization bounds for gradient Langevin Dynamics (GLD). Using the same framework with a carefully constructed continuous prior, we show a new high probability generalization bound of order O(frac1n + fracL2n2sumt=1T(γt/σt)2) for GLD. The new 1/n2 rate is due to the concentration of the difference between the gradient of training samples and that of the prior.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2022.

Builds on

40 of 75 references.

References · 40

  1. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,621
  2. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,674
  3. 2017Spectrally-normalized margin bounds for neural networkscited by 686
  4. 2018Gradient Descent Finds Global Minima of Deep Neural Networkscited by 574
  5. 2019Fine-Grained Analysis of Optimization and Generalization for Overparameterized Two-Layer Neural Networkscited by 566
  6. 2015Train faster, generalize better: Stability of stochastic gradient descentcited by 552
  7. 2017Computing Nonvacuous Generalization Bounds for Deep (Stochastic) Neural Networks with Many More Parameters than Training Datacited by 533
  8. 2016Entropy-SGD: Biasing Gradient Descent Into Wide Valleyscited by 359
  9. 2017A PAC-Bayesian Approach to Spectrally-Normalized Margin Bounds for Neural Networkscited by 314
  10. 2018Stronger generalization bounds for deep nets via a compression approachcited by 307
  11. 2017Size-Independent Sample Complexity of Neural Networkscited by 290
  12. 2017Non-convex learning via Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics: a nonasymptotic analysiscited by 243
28 more
  1. 2019Uniform convergence may be unable to explain generalization in deep learningcited by 224
  2. 2019Generalization Bounds of Stochastic Gradient Descent for Wide and Deep Neural Networkscited by 222
  3. 2015Stochastic modified equations and adaptive stochastic gradient algorithmscited by 142
  4. 2018Regularization Matters: Generalization and Optimization of Neural Nets v.s. their Induced Kernelcited by 131
  5. 2018Non-Vacuous Generalization Bounds at the ImageNet Scale: A PAC-Bayesian Compression Approachcited by 126
  6. 2019Information-Theoretic Generalization Bounds for SGLD via Data-Dependent Estimatescited by 119
  7. 2019Tightening Mutual Information Based Bounds on Generalization Errorcited by 117
  8. 2019High probability generalization bounds for uniformly stable algorithms with nearly optimal ratecited by 98
  9. 2019Sharper bounds for uniformly stable algorithmscited by 93
  10. 2017Data-Dependent Stability of Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 92
  11. 2020Sharpened Generalization Bounds based on Conditional Mutual Information and an Application to Noisy, Iterative Algorithmscited by 89
  12. 2017Generalization Bounds of SGLD for Non-convex Learning: Two Theoretical Viewpointscited by 82
  13. 2018Generalization Error Bounds for Noisy, Iterative Algorithmscited by 82
  14. 2021On the Validity of Modeling SGD with Stochastic Differential Equations (SDEs)cited by 73
  15. 2017A Hitting Time Analysis of Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamicscited by 71
  16. 2020On the role of data in PAC-Bayes boundscited by 64
  17. 2020Hausdorff Dimension, Heavy Tails, and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 62
  18. 2019On Generalization Error Bounds of Noisy Gradient Methods for Non-Convex Learningcited by 57
  19. 2018Stability and Convergence Trade-off of Iterative Optimization Algorithmscited by 53
  20. 2019Generalization in Deep Networks: The Role of Distance from Initializationcited by 51
  21. 2021Strength of Minibatch Noise in SGDcited by 39
  22. 2017A PAC-Bayesian Analysis of Randomized Learning with Application to Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 29
  23. 2021Generalization Bounds using Lower Tail Exponents in Stochastic Optimizerscited by 27
  24. 2016Lets keep it simple, Using simple architectures to outperform deeper and more complex architecturescited by 25
  25. 2019Fast-rate PAC-Bayes Generalization Bounds via Shifted Rademacher Processescited by 20
  26. 2021Learning Stochastic Majority Votes by Minimizing a PAC-Bayes Generalization Boundcited by 16
  27. 2019On Stationary-Point Hitting Time and Ergodicity of Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamicscited by 14
  28. 2021Generalization Bounds for Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics: A Unified View via Information Leakage Analysiscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

5 papers.