mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Gradient-Discrepancy Acquisition for Pool-Based Active Learning

arXiv 2605.02609 ↗First posted 4 May 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The effectiveness of active learning hinges on the choice of the acquisition criterion by which a learning algorithm selects potentially informative data points whose label is subsequently queried. This paper proposes a novel gradient-based acquisition criterion, derived from a generalization bound introduced by Luo et al. (2022). This criterion can be applied in lieu of uncertainty measures in uncertainty sampling, or incorporated into diversity-based methods that consider the spread of sampled points in addition to the uncertainty of their labels. We provide a theoretical justification of the proposed acquisition criterion, and demonstrate its effectiveness in an empirical evaluation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 May 2026.

Builds on

9 of 29 references.

References · 9

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  3. 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
  4. 2017Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Datacited by 812
  5. 2019Deep Batch Active Learning by Diverse, Uncertain Gradient Lower Boundscited by 602
  6. 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 529
  7. 2014OpenML: networked science in machine learningcited by 523
  8. 2018Practical Obstacles to Deploying Active Learningcited by 68
  9. 2022Generalization Bounds for Gradient Methods via Discrete and Continuous Priorcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.