mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Investigating Lexical Replacements for Arabic-English Code-Switched Data Augmentation

arXiv 2205.12649 ↗First posted 25 May 2022cs.CLcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data sparsity is a main problem hindering the development of code-switching (CS) NLP systems. In this paper, we investigate data augmentation techniques for synthesizing dialectal Arabic-English CS text. We perform lexical replacements using word-aligned parallel corpora where CS points are either randomly chosen or learnt using a sequence-to-sequence model. We compare these approaches against dictionary-based replacements. We assess the quality of the generated sentences through human evaluation and evaluate the effectiveness of data augmentation on machine translation (MT), automatic speech recognition (ASR), and speech translation (ST) tasks. Results show that using a predictive model results in more natural CS sentences compared to the random approach, as reported in human judgements. In the downstream tasks, despite the random approach generating more data, both approaches perform equally (outperforming dictionary-based replacements). Overall, data augmentation achieves 34% improvement in perplexity, 5.2% relative improvement on WER for ASR task, +4.0-5.1 BLEU points on MT task, and +2.1-2.2 BLEU points on ST over a baseline trained on available data without augmentation.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2022.

Builds on

23 of 73 references.

References · 23

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  3. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,799
  4. 2019fairseq: A Fast, Extensible Toolkit for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,488
  5. 2019SpecAugment: A Simple Data Augmentation Method for Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 1,380
  6. 2018ESPnet: End-to-End Speech Processing Toolkitcited by 558
  7. 2019The FLoRes Evaluation Datasets for Low-Resource Machine Translation: Nepali-English and Sinhala-Englishcited by 62
  8. 2017Speech Recognition Challenge in the Wild: Arabic MGB-3cited by 60
  9. 2019Code-Switched Language Models Using Neural Based Synthetic Data from Parallel Sentencescited by 55
  10. 2019Code-Switching for Enhancing NMT with Pre-Specified Translationcited by 53
  11. 2021From Machine Translation to Code-Switching: Generating High-Quality Code-Switched Textcited by 29
  12. 2018Code-switching Sentence Generation by Generative Adversarial Networks and its Application to Data Augmentationcited by 26
11 more
  1. 2021Can You Traducir This? Machine Translation for Code-Switched Inputcited by 21
  2. 2016Challenges of Computational Processing of Code-Switchingcited by 20
  3. 2021Investigations on Speech Recognition Systems for Low-Resource Dialectal Arabic-English Code-Switching Speechcited by 15
  4. 2013LDC Arabic Treebanks and Associated Corpora: Data Divisions Manualcited by 11
  5. 2022Textual Data Augmentation for Arabic-English Code-Switching Speech Recognitioncited by 10
  6. 2018Learn to Code-Switch: Data Augmentation using Copy Mechanism on Language Modelingcited by 9
  7. 2021Improving Code-switching Language Modeling with Artificially Generated Texts using Cycle-consistent Adversarial Networkscited by 9
  8. 2019The Impact of Preprocessing on Arabic-English Statistical and Neural Machine Translationcited by 6
  9. 2019Code-switching Language Modeling With Bilingual Word Embeddings: A Case Study for Egyptian Arabic-Englishcited by 6
  10. 2021Low-Resource Machine Translation Training Curriculum Fit for Low-Resource Languagescited by 3
  11. 2021IMS' Systems for the IWSLT 2021 Low-Resource Speech Translation Taskcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 5.

9 papers.