mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Deletion and Insertion Tests in Regression Models

arXiv 2205.12423 ↗First posted 25 May 2022cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A basic task in explainable AI (XAI) is to identify the most important features behind a prediction made by a black box function f. The insertion and deletion tests of Petsiuk et al. (2018) can be used to judge the quality of algorithms that rank pixels from most to least important for a classification. Motivated by regression problems we establish a formula for their area under the curve (AUC) criteria in terms of certain main effects and interactions in an anchored decomposition of f. We find an expression for the expected value of the AUC under a random ordering of inputs to f and propose an alternative area above a straight line for the regression setting. We use this criterion to compare feature importances computed by integrated gradients (IG) to those computed by Kernel SHAP (KS) as well as LIME, DeepLIFT, vanilla gradient and input×gradient methods. KS has the best overall performance in two datasets we consider but it is very expensive to compute. We find that IG is nearly as good as KS while being much faster. Our comparison problems include some binary inputs that pose a challenge to IG because it must use values between the possible variable levels and so we consider ways to handle binary variables in IG. We show that sorting variables by their Shapley value does not necessarily give the optimal ordering for an insertion-deletion test. It will however do that for monotone functions of additive models, such as logistic regression.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2022.

Builds on

38 of 72 references.

References · 38

  1. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  2. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  3. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  4. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  5. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  6. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
  7. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  8. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,455
  9. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  10. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
  11. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
  12. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
26 more
  1. 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 825
  2. 2020Captum: A unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorchcited by 542
  3. 2018A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networkscited by 467
  4. 2015Evaluating the visualization of what a Deep Neural Network has learnedcited by 416
  5. 2019The many Shapley values for model explanationcited by 341
  6. 2016Top-down Neural Attention by Excitation Backpropcited by 318
  7. 2022From Anecdotal Evidence to Quantitative Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review on Evaluating Explainable AIcited by 299
  8. 2016Not Just a Black Box: Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 295
  9. 2020Problems with Shapley-value-based explanations as feature importance measurescited by 198
  10. 2020Debugging Tests for Model Explanationscited by 146
  11. 2021Benchmarking and Survey of Explanation Methods for Black Box Modelscited by 136
  12. 2021Explainable AI (XAI): A Systematic Meta-Survey of Current Challenges and Future Opportunitiescited by 125
  13. 2021Human-Centered Explainable AI (XAI): From Algorithms to User Experiencescited by 123
  14. 2020Benchmarking Deep Learning Interpretability in Time Series Predictionscited by 102
  15. 2021Look at the Variance! Efficient Black-box Explanations with Sobol-based Sensitivity Analysiscited by 65
  16. 2022A Rigorous Study of Integrated Gradients Method and Extensions to Internal Neuron Attributionscited by 64
  17. 2019Visualizing Deep Networks by Optimizing with Integrated Gradientscited by 59
  18. 2020Evaluations and Methods for Explanation through Robustness Analysiscited by 51
  19. 2022Metrics for saliency map evaluation of deep learning explanation methodscited by 40
  20. 2021On Baselines for Local Feature Attributionscited by 29
  21. 2019Explaining black box decisions by Shapley cohort refinementcited by 26
  22. 2021Counterfactual Shapley Additive Explanationscited by 22
  23. 2020iGOS++: Integrated Gradient Optimized Saliency by Bilateral Perturbationscited by 19
  24. 2020A Baseline for Shapley Values in MLPs: from Missingness to Neutralitycited by 11
  25. 2021XPROAX-Local explanations for text classification with progressive neighborhood approximationcited by 5
  26. 2020Computing Shapley Effects for Sensitivity Analysiscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 3; 2026: 4.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: