mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Class-Specific Explainability for Deep Time Series Classifiers

arXiv 2210.05411 ↗First posted 11 Oct 2022cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Explainability helps users trust deep learning solutions for time series classification. However, existing explainability methods for multi-class time series classifiers focus on one class at a time, ignoring relationships between the classes. Instead, when a classifier is choosing between many classes, an effective explanation must show what sets the chosen class apart from the rest. We now formalize this notion, studying the open problem of class-specific explainability for deep time series classifiers, a challenging and impactful problem setting. We design a novel explainability method, DEMUX, which learns saliency maps for explaining deep multi-class time series classifiers by adaptively ensuring that its explanation spotlights the regions in an input time series that a model uses specifically to its predicted class. DEMUX adopts a gradient-based approach composed of three interdependent modules that combine to generate consistent, class-specific saliency maps that remain faithful to the classifier's behavior yet are easily understood by end users. Our experimental study demonstrates that DEMUX outperforms nine state-of-the-art alternatives on five popular datasets when explaining two types of deep time series classifiers. Further, through a case study, we demonstrate that DEMUX's explanations indeed highlight what separates the predicted class from the others in the eyes of the classifier. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/rameshdoddaiah/DEMUX.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2022.

Builds on

21 of 39 references.

References · 21

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  4. 2015Prioritized Experience Replaycited by 1,070
  5. 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 825
  6. 2017Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbationcited by 611
  7. 2016Recurrent Neural Networks for Multivariate Time Series with Missing Valuescited by 548
  8. 2016Time Series Classification from Scratch with Deep Neural Networks: A Strong Baselinecited by 358
  9. 2019Understanding Deep Networks via Extremal Perturbations and Smooth Maskscited by 257
  10. 2020Problems with Shapley-value-based explanations as feature importance measurescited by 198
  11. 2019Automatic diagnosis of the 12-lead ECG using a deep neural networkcited by 164
  12. 2020Benchmarking Deep Learning Interpretability in Time Series Predictionscited by 102
9 more
  1. 2020TimeSHAP: Explaining Recurrent Models through Sequence Perturbationscited by 73
  2. 2021Explaining Time Series Predictions with Dynamic Maskscited by 72
  3. 2019Towards a Rigorous Evaluation of XAI Methods on Time Seriescited by 67
  4. 2021TS-MULE: Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations for Time Series Forecast Modelscited by 28
  5. 2022Deletion and Insertion Tests in Regression Modelscited by 14
  6. 2016Automatic time-series phenotyping using massive feature extractioncited by 12
  7. 2020timeXplain -- A Framework for Explaining the Predictions of Time Series Classifierscited by 9
  8. 2020What went wrong and when? Instance-wise Feature Importance for Time-series Modelscited by 6
  9. 2018Human activity recognition based on time series analysis using U-Netcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

6 papers.