mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Super Agents and Confounders: Influence of surrounding agents on vehicle trajectory prediction

arXiv 2604.03463 ↗First posted 3 Apr 2026cs.LG cs.ROcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In highly interactive driving scenes, trajectory prediction is conditioned on information from surrounding traffic participants such as cars and pedestrians. Our main contribution is a comprehensive analysis of state-of-the-art trajectory predictors, which reveals a surprising and critical flaw: many surrounding agents degrade prediction accuracy rather than improve it. Using Shapley-based attribution, we rigorously demonstrate that models learn unstable and non-causal decision-making schemes that vary significantly across training runs. Building on these insights, we propose to integrate a Conditional Information Bottleneck (CIB), which does not require additional supervision and is trained to effectively compress agent features as well as ignore those that are not beneficial for the prediction task. Comprehensive experiments using multiple datasets and model architectures demonstrate that this simple yet effective approach not only improves overall trajectory prediction performance in many cases but also increases robustness to different perturbations. Our results highlight the importance of selectively integrating contextual information, which can often contain spurious or misleading signals, in trajectory prediction. Moreover, we provide interpretable metrics for identifying non-robust behavior and present a promising avenue towards a solution.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Apr 2026.

Builds on

23 of 29 references.

References · 23

  1. 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,485
  2. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
  3. 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 916
  4. 2016Deep Variational Information Bottleneckcited by 915
  5. 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 825
  6. 2021Large Scale Interactive Motion Forecasting for Autonomous Driving : The Waymo Open Motion Datasetcited by 532
  7. 2022Motion Transformer with Global Intention Localization and Local Movement Refinementcited by 267
  8. 2020Learning Robust Representations via Multi-View Information Bottleneckcited by 189
  9. 2023MTR++: Multi-Agent Motion Prediction with Symmetric Scene Modeling and Guided Intention Queryingcited by 139
  10. 2022On Adversarial Robustness of Trajectory Prediction for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 89
  11. 2023LAformer: Trajectory Prediction for Autonomous Driving with Lane-Aware Scene Constraintscited by 50
  12. 2022AdvDO: Realistic Adversarial Attacks for Trajectory Predictioncited by 48
11 more
  1. 2021Improving Subgraph Recognition with Variational Graph Information Bottleneckcited by 45
  2. 2021Are socially-aware trajectory prediction models really socially-aware?cited by 32
  3. 2023QCNeXt: A Next-Generation Framework For Joint Multi-Agent Trajectory Predictioncited by 31
  4. 2024Reasoning Multi-Agent Behavioral Topology for Interactive Autonomous Drivingcited by 27
  5. 2023Conditional Graph Information Bottleneck for Molecular Relational Learningcited by 24
  6. 2021You Mostly Walk Alone: Analyzing Feature Attribution in Trajectory Predictioncited by 23
  7. 2022CausalAgents: A Robustness Benchmark for Motion Forecasting using Causal Relationshipscited by 18
  8. 2023EDA: Evolving and Distinct Anchors for Multimodal Motion Predictioncited by 17
  9. 2022Deletion and Insertion Tests in Regression Modelscited by 14
  10. 2024Curb Your Attention: Causal Attention Gating for Robust Trajectory Prediction in Autonomous Drivingcited by 9
  11. 2024A Joint Prediction Method of Multi-Agent to Reduce Collision Ratecited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.