mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On Baselines for Local Feature Attributions

arXiv 2101.00905 ↗First posted 4 Jan 2021cs.LGcited by 29

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

High-performing predictive models, such as neural nets, usually operate as black boxes, which raises serious concerns about their interpretability. Local feature attribution methods help to explain black box models and are therefore a powerful tool for assessing the reliability and fairness of predictions. To this end, most attribution models compare the importance of input features with a reference value, often called baseline. Recent studies show that the baseline can heavily impact the quality of feature attributions. Yet, we frequently find simplistic baselines, such as the zero vector, in practice. In this paper, we show empirically that baselines can significantly alter the discriminative power of feature attributions. We conduct our analysis on tabular data sets, thus complementing recent works on image data. Besides, we propose a new taxonomy of baseline methods. Our experimental study illustrates the sensitivity of popular attribution models to the baseline, thus laying the foundation for a more in-depth discussion on sensible baseline methods for tabular data.

Key facts. Cited by 29 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jan 2021.

Builds on

12 of 17 references.

References · 12

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  3. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  4. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
  5. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,156
  6. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,109
  7. 2017Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbationcited by 612
  8. 2019The many Shapley values for model explanationcited by 344
  9. 2018Consistent Individualized Feature Attribution for Tree Ensemblescited by 285
  10. 2020Learning Parameter Distributions to Detect Concept Drift in Data Streamscited by 12
  11. 2020A Baseline for Shapley Values in MLPs: from Missingness to Neutralitycited by 11
  12. 2020Leveraging Model Inherent Variable Importance for Stable Online Feature Selectioncited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 10; 2023: 3; 2024: 7; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

29 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021Deep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A Surveycited by 491
  2. 2022CRAFT: Concept Recursive Activation FacTorization for Explainabilitycited by 178
  3. 2023A Holistic Approach to Unifying Automatic Concept Extraction and Concept Importance Estimationcited by 109
  4. 2022A Consistent and Efficient Evaluation Strategy for Attribution Methodscited by 102
  5. 2021The Out-of-Distribution Problem in Explainability and Search Methods for Feature Importance Explanationscited by 87
  6. 2022Don't Lie to Me! Robust and Efficient Explainability with Verified Perturbation Analysiscited by 38
  7. 2024Decoupling Pixel Flipping and Occlusion Strategy for Consistent XAI Benchmarkscited by 28
  8. 2021Fast Hierarchical Games for Image Explanationscited by 15
  9. 2022Deletion and Insertion Tests in Regression Modelscited by 14
  10. 2022BASED-XAI: Breaking Ablation Studies Down for Explainable Artificial Intelligencecited by 13
  11. 2022Change Detection for Local Explainability in Evolving Data Streamscited by 8
  12. 2022Dynamic Model Tree for Interpretable Data Stream Learningcited by 6
17 more
  1. 2022On the explainable properties of 1-Lipschitz Neural Networks: An Optimal Transport Perspectivecited by 6
  2. 2023The Disagreement Problem in Faithfulness Metricscited by 6
  3. 2024Toward Understanding the Disagreement Problem in Neural Network Feature Attributioncited by 6
  4. 2022Standardized Evaluation of Machine Learning Methods for Evolving Data Streamscited by 4
  5. 2022Comparing Baseline Shapley and Integrated Gradients for Local Explanation: Some Additional Insightscited by 3
  6. 2025Fidelity-Aware Recommendation Explanations via Stochastic Path Integrationcited by 3
  7. 2021A Robust Unsupervised Ensemble of Feature-Based Explanations using Restricted Boltzmann Machinescited by 2
  8. 2023Fixing confirmation bias in feature attribution methods via semantic matchcited by 2
  9. 2024Faithfulness and the Notion of Adversarial Sensitivity in NLP Explanationscited by 2
  10. 2024Reconciling Privacy and Explainability in High-Stakes: A Systematic Inquirycited by 1
  11. 2025Guidelines For The Choice Of The Baseline in XAI Attribution Methodscited by 1
  12. 2026Missingness Bias Calibration in Feature Attribution Explanationscited by 1
  13. 2024Root Causing Prediction Anomalies Using Explainable AIcited by 0
  14. 2024Choose Your Explanation: A Comparison of SHAP and GradCAM in Human Activity Recognitioncited by 0
  15. 2024Saliency Methods are Encoders: Analysing Logical Relations Towards Interpretationcited by 0
  16. 2026Improving Adversarial Robustness of Attribution via Implicit Regularizationcited by 0
  17. 2026XtrAIn: Training-Guided Occlusion for Feature Attributioncited by 0