mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ShapBPT: Image Feature Attributions Using Data-Aware Binary Partition Trees

arXiv 2602.07047 ↗First posted 4 Feb 2026cs.CV cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Pixel-level feature attributions are an important tool in eXplainable AI for Computer Vision (XCV), providing visual insights into how image features influence model predictions. The Owen formula for hierarchical Shapley values has been widely used to interpret machine learning (ML) models and their learned representations. However, existing hierarchical Shapley approaches do not exploit the multiscale structure of image data, leading to slow convergence and weak alignment with the actual morphological features. Moreover, no prior Shapley method has leveraged data-aware hierarchies for Computer Vision tasks, leaving a gap in model interpretability of structured visual data. To address this, this paper introduces ShapBPT, a novel data-aware XCV method based on the hierarchical Shapley formula. ShapBPT assigns Shapley coefficients to a multiscale hierarchical structure tailored for images, the Binary Partition Tree (BPT). By using this data-aware hierarchical partitioning, ShapBPT ensures that feature attributions align with intrinsic image morphology, effectively prioritizing relevant regions while reducing computational overhead. This advancement connects hierarchical Shapley methods with image data, providing a more efficient and semantically meaningful approach to visual interpretability. Experimental results confirm ShapBPT's effectiveness, demonstrating superior alignment with image structures and improved efficiency over existing XCV methods, and a 20-subject user study confirming that ShapBPT explanations are preferred by humans.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2026.

Builds on

22 of 42 references.

References · 22

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  4. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  5. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  6. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
  7. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  8. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  9. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  10. 2017Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variationcited by 2,967
  11. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
  12. 2019Generalized Intersection over Union: A Metric and A Loss for Bounding Box Regressioncited by 1,361
10 more
  1. 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 825
  2. 2020Explaining by Removing: A Unified Framework for Model Explanationcited by 218
  3. 2020Ground Truth Evaluation of Neural Network Explanations with CLEVR-XAIcited by 125
  4. 2021Large-scale Unsupervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 98
  5. 2022The Shapley Value in Machine Learningcited by 97
  6. 2023Explain Any Concept: Segment Anything Meets Concept-Based Explanationcited by 37
  7. 2021Fast Hierarchical Games for Image Explanationscited by 15
  8. 2022Deletion and Insertion Tests in Regression Modelscited by 14
  9. 2023Integrated Decision Gradients: Compute Your Attributions Where the Model Makes Its Decisioncited by 9
  10. 2024Beyond Pixels: Enhancing LIME with Hierarchical Features and Segmentation Foundation Modelscited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.