mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Evidence for Hypodescent in Visual Semantic AI

arXiv 2205.10764 ↗First posted 22 May 2022cs.CV cs.AI cs.CLcited by 30

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We examine the state-of-the-art multimodal "visual semantic" model CLIP ("Contrastive Language Image Pretraining") for the rule of hypodescent, or one-drop rule, whereby multiracial people are more likely to be assigned a racial or ethnic label corresponding to a minority or disadvantaged racial or ethnic group than to the equivalent majority or advantaged group. A face morphing experiment grounded in psychological research demonstrating hypodescent indicates that, at the midway point of 1,000 series of morphed images, CLIP associates 69.7% of Black-White female images with a Black text label over a White text label, and similarly prefers Latina (75.8%) and Asian (89.1%) text labels at the midway point for Latina-White female and Asian-White female morphs, reflecting hypodescent. Additionally, assessment of the underlying cosine similarities in the model reveals that association with White is correlated with association with "person," with Pearson's rho as high as 0.82 over a 21,000-image morph series, indicating that a White person corresponds to the default representation of a person in CLIP. Finally, we show that the stereotype-congruent pleasantness association of an image correlates with association with the Black text label in CLIP, with Pearson's rho = 0.48 for 21,000 Black-White multiracial male images, and rho = 0.41 for Black-White multiracial female images. CLIP is trained on English-language text gathered using data collected from an American website (Wikipedia), and our findings demonstrate that CLIP embeds the values of American racial hierarchy, reflecting the implicit and explicit beliefs that are present in human minds. We contextualize these findings within the history and psychology of hypodescent. Overall, the data suggests that AI supervised using natural language will, unless checked, learn biases that reflect racial hierarchies.

Key facts. Cited by 30 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 93 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2022.

Builds on

41 of 93 references.

References · 41

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  4. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  5. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  6. 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,539
  7. 2021Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generationcited by 4,276
  8. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
  9. 2021GLIDE: Towards Photorealistic Image Generation and Editing with Text-Guided Diffusion Modelscited by 3,595
  10. 2019ViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Taskscited by 2,219
  11. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
  12. 2019Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classificationcited by 1,304
29 more
  1. 2019VisualBERT: A Simple and Performant Baseline for Vision and Languagecited by 1,291
  2. 2020Training Generative Adversarial Networks with Limited Datacited by 1,184
  3. 2021Open-vocabulary Object Detection via Vision and Language Knowledge Distillationcited by 903
  4. 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 894
  5. 2019Contrastive Representation Distillationcited by 734
  6. 2021SimVLM: Simple Visual Language Model Pretraining with Weak Supervisioncited by 645
  7. 2019The Woman Worked as a Babysitter: On Biases in Language Generationcited by 540
  8. 2021SLIP: Self-supervision meets Language-Image Pre-trainingcited by 434
  9. 2019On Measuring Social Biases in Sentence Encoderscited by 397
  10. 2021Persistent Anti-Muslim Bias in Large Language Modelscited by 376
  11. 2021Multimodal datasets: misogyny, pornography, and malignant stereotypescited by 326
  12. 2017Word Embeddings Quantify 100 Years of Gender and Ethnic Stereotypescited by 251
  13. 2013Zero-Shot Learning Through Cross-Modal Transfercited by 237
  14. 2020Detecting Emergent Intersectional Biases: Contextualized Word Embeddings Contain a Distribution of Human-like Biasescited by 167
  15. 2021Evaluating CLIP: Towards Characterization of Broader Capabilities and Downstream Implicationscited by 128
  16. 2020Fair Attribute Classification through Latent Space De-biasingcited by 125
  17. 2021Explaining in Style: Training a GAN to explain a classifier in StyleSpacecited by 122
  18. 2020Image Representations Learned With Unsupervised Pre-Training Contain Human-like Biasescited by 107
  19. 2016Learning Visual N-Grams from Web Datacited by 95
  20. 2021Are Gender-Neutral Queries Really Gender-Neutral? Mitigating Gender Bias in Image Searchcited by 90
  21. 2019Predictive Inequity in Object Detectioncited by 77
  22. 2019Image Counterfactual Sensitivity Analysis for Detecting Unintended Biascited by 74
  23. 2021Discover the Unknown Biased Attribute of an Image Classifiercited by 46
  24. 2021Low Frequency Names Exhibit Bias and Overfitting in Contextualizing Language Modelscited by 39
  25. 2020Imperfect ImaGANation: Implications of GANs Exacerbating Biases on Facial Data Augmentation and Snapchat Selfie Lensescited by 27
  26. 2021Dodging Attack Using Carefully Crafted Natural Makeupcited by 17
  27. 2020ValNorm Quantifies Semantics to Reveal Consistent Valence Biases Across Languages and Over Centuriescited by 15
  28. 2022Contrastive Visual Semantic Pretraining Magnifies the Semantics of Natural Language Representationscited by 14
  29. 2022VAST: The Valence-Assessing Semantics Test for Contextualizing Language Modelscited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 6; 2023: 7; 2024: 9; 2025: 7; 2026: 1.

30 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Easily Accessible Text-to-Image Generation Amplifies Demographic Stereotypes at Large Scalecited by 262
  2. 2023Marked Personas: Using Natural Language Prompts to Measure Stereotypes in Language Modelscited by 204
  3. 2023The political ideology of conversational AI: Converging evidence on ChatGPT's pro-environmental, left-libertarian orientationcited by 183
  4. 2023Generative AIcited by 119
  5. 2022American == White in Multimodal Language-and-Image AIcited by 39
  6. 2023T2IAT: Measuring Valence and Stereotypical Biases in Text-to-Image Generationcited by 39
  7. 2022Mutual Information Divergence: A Unified Metric for Multimodal Generative Modelscited by 35
  8. 2022Exploiting Cultural Biases via Homoglyphs in Text-to-Image Synthesiscited by 29
  9. 2024Identifying Implicit Social Biases in Vision-Language Modelscited by 27
  10. 2023Stable Diffusion Exposed: Gender Bias from Prompt to Imagecited by 25
  11. 2024FairerCLIP: Debiasing CLIP's Zero-Shot Predictions using Functions in RKHSscited by 25
  12. 2022Gender Bias in Word Embeddings: A Comprehensive Analysis of Frequency, Syntax, and Semanticscited by 24
18 more
  1. 2022FairCLIP: Social Bias Elimination based on Attribute Prototype Learning and Representation Neutralizationcited by 20
  2. 2024A Unified Debiasing Approach for Vision-Language Models across Modalities and Taskscited by 18
  3. 2024BendVLM: Test-Time Debiasing of Vision-Language Embeddingscited by 17
  4. 2024Joint Vision-Language Social Bias Removal for CLIPcited by 17
  5. 2024Social Perception of Faces in a Vision-Language Modelcited by 10
  6. 2025Intrinsic Bias is Predicted by Pretraining Data and Correlates with Downstream Performance in Vision-Language Encoderscited by 6
  7. 2025Biases Propagate in Encoder-based Vision-Language Models: A Systematic Analysis From Intrinsic Measures to Zero-shot Retrieval Outcomescited by 6
  8. 2023Towards Reliable Assessments of Demographic Disparities in Multi-Label Image Classifierscited by 5
  9. 2024Racial/Ethnic Categories in AI and Algorithmic Fairness: Why They Matter and What They Representcited by 5
  10. 2025Bias Amplification in Stable Diffusion's Representation of Stigma Through Skin Tones and Their Homogeneitycited by 5
  11. 2023Biased Attention: Do Vision Transformers Amplify Gender Bias More than Convolutional Neural Networks?cited by 4
  12. 2024Dataset Scale and Societal Consistency Mediate Facial Impression Bias in Vision-Language AIcited by 4
  13. 2025Person-Centric Annotations of LAION-400M: Auditing Bias and Its Transfer to Modelscited by 4
  14. 2024ML-EAT: A Multilevel Embedding Association Test for Interpretable and Transparent Social Sciencecited by 3
  15. 2025Model-Agnostic Gender Bias Control for Text-to-Image Generation via Sparse Autoencodercited by 3
  16. 2025An Image is Worth K Topics: A Visual Structural Topic Model with Pretrained Image Embeddingscited by 1
  17. 2025Replicating Human Social Perception in Generative AI: Evaluating the Valence-Dominance Modelcited by 0
  18. 2026Calibrating WEAT Against Anisotropy: ZCA Whitening as a Geometric Pre-Processing Step for Embedding Association Testscited by 0