mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Gender Bias in Word Embeddings: A Comprehensive Analysis of Frequency, Syntax, and Semantics

arXiv 2206.03390 ↗First posted 7 Jun 2022cs.CY cs.AI cs.CLcited by 24

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The statistical regularities in language corpora encode well-known social biases into word embeddings. Here, we focus on gender to provide a comprehensive analysis of group-based biases in widely-used static English word embeddings trained on internet corpora (GloVe 2014, fastText 2017). Using the Single-Category Word Embedding Association Test, we demonstrate the widespread prevalence of gender biases that also show differences in: (1) frequencies of words associated with men versus women; (b) part-of-speech tags in gender-associated words; (c) semantic categories in gender-associated words; and (d) valence, arousal, and dominance in gender-associated words. First, in terms of word frequency: we find that, of the 1,000 most frequent words in the vocabulary, 77% are more associated with men than women, providing direct evidence of a masculine default in the everyday language of the English-speaking world. Second, turning to parts-of-speech: the top male-associated words are typically verbs (e.g., fight, overpower) while the top female-associated words are typically adjectives and adverbs (e.g., giving, emotionally). Gender biases in embeddings also permeate parts-of-speech. Third, for semantic categories: bottom-up, cluster analyses of the top 1,000 words associated with each gender. The top male-associated concepts include roles and domains of big tech, engineering, religion, sports, and violence; in contrast, the top female-associated concepts are less focused on roles, including, instead, female-specific slurs and sexual content, as well as appearance and kitchen terms. Fourth, using human ratings of word valence, arousal, and dominance from a ~20,000 word lexicon, we find that male-associated words are higher on arousal and dominance, while female-associated words are higher on valence.

Key facts. Cited by 24 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2022.

Builds on

25 of 61 references.

References · 25

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,578
  3. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
  4. 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 894
  5. 2019Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Settingcited by 346
  6. 2021Multimodal datasets: misogyny, pornography, and malignant stereotypescited by 326
  7. 2019Lipstick on a Pig: Debiasing Methods Cover up Systematic Gender Biases in Word Embeddings But do not Remove Themcited by 268
  8. 2020Data and its (dis)contents: A survey of dataset development and use in machine learning researchcited by 259
  9. 2017Word Embeddings Quantify 100 Years of Gender and Ethnic Stereotypescited by 251
  10. 2017Advances in Pre-Training Distributed Word Representationscited by 207
  11. 2019Gender Bias in Contextualized Word Embeddingscited by 203
  12. 2020Detecting Emergent Intersectional Biases: Contextualized Word Embeddings Contain a Distribution of Human-like Biasescited by 167
13 more
  1. 2021Harms of Gender Exclusivity and Challenges in Non-Binary Representation in Language Technologiescited by 128
  2. 2020Image Representations Learned With Unsupervised Pre-Training Contain Human-like Biasescited by 107
  3. 2020SemEval-2020 Task 1: Unsupervised Lexical Semantic Change Detectioncited by 105
  4. 2019Evaluating the Underlying Gender Bias in Contextualized Word Embeddingscited by 94
  5. 2018Understanding the Origins of Bias in Word Embeddingscited by 90
  6. 2021Low Frequency Names Exhibit Bias and Overfitting in Contextualizing Language Modelscited by 39
  7. 2020The Grey Hoodie Project: Big Tobacco, Big Tech, and the threat on academic integritycited by 38
  8. 2020Double-Hard Debias: Tailoring Word Embeddings for Gender Bias Mitigationcited by 36
  9. 2018Factors Influencing the Surprising Instability of Word Embeddingscited by 31
  10. 2022Evidence for Hypodescent in Visual Semantic AIcited by 30
  11. 2022Markedness in Visual Semantic AIcited by 29
  12. 2020ValNorm Quantifies Semantics to Reveal Consistent Valence Biases Across Languages and Over Centuriescited by 15
  13. 2022VAST: The Valence-Assessing Semantics Test for Contextualizing Language Modelscited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 6; 2024: 9; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

24 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Contrastive Language-Vision AI Models Pretrained on Web-Scraped Multimodal Data Exhibit Sexual Objectification Biascited by 43
  2. 2022American == White in Multimodal Language-and-Image AIcited by 39
  3. 2023ChatGPT Perpetuates Gender Bias in Machine Translation and Ignores Non-Gendered Pronouns: Findings across Bengali and Five other Low-Resource Languagescited by 33
  4. 2023On the Independence of Association Bias and Empirical Fairness in Language Modelscited by 29
  5. 2023Unmasking Nationality Bias: A Study of Human Perception of Nationalities in AI-Generated Articlescited by 16
  6. 2024Who's in and who's out? A case study of multimodal CLIP-filtering in DataCompcited by 15
  7. 2024TuBA: Cross-Lingual Transferability of Backdoor Attacks in LLMs with Instruction Tuningcited by 13
  8. 2024Discover and Mitigate Multiple Biased Subgroups in Image Classifierscited by 11
  9. 2023Semantic and Expressive Variation in Image Captions Across Languagescited by 8
  10. 2023Toward Operationalizing Pipeline-aware ML Fairness: A Research Agenda for Developing Practical Guidelines and Toolscited by 7
  11. 2024Abstraction Alignment: Comparing Model-Learned and Human-Encoded Conceptual Relationshipscited by 7
  12. 2022Conceptor-Aided Debiasing of Large Language Modelscited by 4
12 more
  1. 2024Gender Bias in Machine Translation and The Era of Large Language Modelscited by 4
  2. 2023Gender Bias in Transformer Models: A comprehensive surveycited by 2
  3. 2024A Taxonomy of Stereotype Content in Large Language Modelscited by 2
  4. 2024GradBias: Unveiling Word Influence on Bias in Text-to-Image Generative Modelscited by 2
  5. 2025Measuring Gender Bias in Job Title Matching for Grammatical Gender Languagescited by 2
  6. 2024ConFit: Improving Resume-Job Matching using Data Augmentation and Contrastive Learningcited by 1
  7. 2024Debias-CLR: A Contrastive Learning Based Debiasing Method for Algorithmic Fairness in Healthcare Applicationscited by 1
  8. 2026Gender and Race Bias in Consumer Product Recommendations by Large Language Modelscited by 1
  9. 2026Greater accessibility can amplify discrimination in generative AIcited by 1
  10. 2025Transparent Semantic Spaces: A Categorical Approach to Explainable Word Embeddingscited by 0
  11. 2025A Use-Case Specific Dataset for Measuring Dimensions of Responsible Performance in LLM-generated Textcited by 0
  12. 2026What Does Debiasing Really Remove? A Geometric Study of PCA-Based Gender Debiasing in Word Embeddingscited by 0