mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Dataset Scale and Societal Consistency Mediate Facial Impression Bias in Vision-Language AI

arXiv 2408.01959 ↗First posted 4 Aug 2024cs.CV cs.AI cs.CLcited by 4

On the map: Diffusion models → Image generation, text-to-image and editing

Abstract (arXiv)

Multimodal AI models capable of associating images and text hold promise for numerous domains, ranging from automated image captioning to accessibility applications for blind and low-vision users. However, uncertainty about bias has in some cases limited their adoption and availability. In the present work, we study 43 CLIP vision-language models to determine whether they learn human-like facial impression biases, and we find evidence that such biases are reflected across three distinct CLIP model families. We show for the first time that the the degree to which a bias is shared across a society predicts the degree to which it is reflected in a CLIP model. Human-like impressions of visually unobservable attributes, like trustworthiness and sexuality, emerge only in models trained on the largest dataset, indicating that a better fit to uncurated cultural data results in the reproduction of increasingly subtle social biases. Moreover, we use a hierarchical clustering approach to show that dataset size predicts the extent to which the underlying structure of facial impression bias resembles that of facial impression bias in humans. Finally, we show that Stable Diffusion models employing CLIP as a text encoder learn facial impression biases, and that these biases intersect with racial biases in Stable Diffusion XL-Turbo. While pretrained CLIP models may prove useful for scientific studies of bias, they will also require significant dataset curation when intended for use as general-purpose models in a zero-shot setting.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Image generation, text-to-image and editing, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 37 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2024.

Builds on

37 of 73 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latents13 Apr

Other references · 36

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  4. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  5. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
  6. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  7. 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,986
  8. 2021Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generationcited by 4,276
  9. 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,131
  10. 2019Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANcited by 3,580
  11. 2023InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuningcited by 2,855
  12. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
24 more
  1. 2021LAION-400M: Open Dataset of CLIP-Filtered 400 Million Image-Text Pairscited by 1,544
  2. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
  3. 2021SimMIM: A Simple Framework for Masked Image Modelingcited by 1,147
  4. 2017Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Eracited by 916
  5. 2020Contrastive Learning of Medical Visual Representations from Paired Images and Textcited by 636
  6. 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?cited by 603
  7. 2017Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empiricallycited by 556
  8. 2021Multimodal datasets: misogyny, pornography, and malignant stereotypescited by 326
  9. 2022VQGAN-CLIP: Open Domain Image Generation and Editing with Natural Language Guidancecited by 285
  10. 2017Word Embeddings Quantify 100 Years of Gender and Ethnic Stereotypescited by 251
  11. 2023Stable Bias: Analyzing Societal Representations in Diffusion Modelscited by 225
  12. 2019RetinaFace: Single-stage Dense Face Localisation in the Wildcited by 164
  13. 2021VALSE: A Task-Independent Benchmark for Vision and Language Models Centered on Linguistic Phenomenacited by 134
  14. 2021Are Gender-Neutral Queries Really Gender-Neutral? Mitigating Gender Bias in Image Searchcited by 90
  15. 2022A Systematic Study of Bias Amplificationcited by 65
  16. 2024Examining Gender and Racial Bias in Large Vision-Language Models Using a Novel Dataset of Parallel Imagescited by 55
  17. 2022American == White in Multimodal Language-and-Image AIcited by 39
  18. 2022Evidence for Hypodescent in Visual Semantic AIcited by 30
  19. 2024The Dark Side of Dataset Scaling: Evaluating Racial Classification in Multimodal Modelscited by 23
  20. 2023Evaluating Biased Attitude Associations of Language Models in an Intersectional Contextcited by 20
  21. 2020ValNorm Quantifies Semantics to Reveal Consistent Valence Biases Across Languages and Over Centuriescited by 15
  22. 2022Contrastive Visual Semantic Pretraining Magnifies the Semantics of Natural Language Representationscited by 14
  23. 2022VAST: The Valence-Assessing Semantics Test for Contextualizing Language Modelscited by 10
  24. 2022How Algorithms Shape the Distribution of Political Advertising: Case Studies of Facebook, Google, and TikTokcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Identifying Implicit Social Biases in Vision-Language Models
  2. 2024Social Perception of Faces in a Vision-Language Model
  3. 2025Data Matters Most: Auditing Social Bias in Contrastive Vision Language Models
  4. 2023MultiModal Bias: Introducing a Framework for Stereotypical Bias Assessment beyond Gender and Race in Vision Language Models
  5. 2026StylisticBias: A Few Human Visual Cues Drive Most Social Biases in MLLMs
  6. 2024AI-generated faces influence gender stereotypes and racial homogenization
  7. 2026Measuring Social Bias in Vision-Language Models with Face-Only Counterfactuals from Real Photos
  8. 2024A Unified Framework and Dataset for Assessing Societal Bias in Vision-Language Models