mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Contrastive Visual Semantic Pretraining Magnifies the Semantics of Natural Language Representations

arXiv 2203.07511 ↗First posted 14 Mar 2022cs.CL cs.AI cs.CYcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We examine the effects of contrastive visual semantic pretraining by comparing the geometry and semantic properties of contextualized English language representations formed by GPT-2 and CLIP, a zero-shot multimodal image classifier which adapts the GPT-2 architecture to encode image captions. We find that contrastive visual semantic pretraining significantly mitigates the anisotropy found in contextualized word embeddings from GPT-2, such that the intra-layer self-similarity (mean pairwise cosine similarity) of CLIP word embeddings is under .25 in all layers, compared to greater than .95 in the top layer of GPT-2. CLIP word embeddings outperform GPT-2 on word-level semantic intrinsic evaluation tasks, and achieve a new corpus-based state of the art for the RG65 evaluation, at .88. CLIP also forms fine-grained semantic representations of sentences, and obtains Spearman's rho = .73 on the SemEval-2017 Semantic Textual Similarity Benchmark with no fine-tuning, compared to no greater than rho = .45 in any layer of GPT-2. Finally, intra-layer self-similarity of CLIP sentence embeddings decreases as the layer index increases, finishing at .25 in the top layer, while the self-similarity of GPT-2 sentence embeddings formed using the EOS token increases layer-over-layer and never falls below .97. Our results indicate that high anisotropy is not an inevitable consequence of contextualization, and that visual semantic pretraining is beneficial not only for ordering visual representations, but also for encoding useful semantic representations of language, both on the word level and the sentence level.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2022.

Builds on

35 of 52 references.

References · 35

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  4. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  5. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  6. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  7. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  8. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  9. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
  10. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,864
  11. 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,290
  12. 2019ViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Taskscited by 2,222
23 more
  1. 2019VisualBERT: A Simple and Performant Baseline for Vision and Languagecited by 1,296
  2. 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,059
  3. 2017SemEval-2017 Task 1: Semantic Textual Similarity - Multilingual and Cross-lingual Focused Evaluationcited by 1,001
  4. 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 901
  5. 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 784
  6. 2019Contrastive Representation Distillationcited by 748
  7. 2021SimVLM: Simple Visual Language Model Pretraining with Weak Supervisioncited by 647
  8. 2020Contrastive Learning of Medical Visual Representations from Paired Images and Textcited by 641
  9. 2020Med-BERT: pre-trained contextualized embeddings on large-scale structured electronic health records for disease predictioncited by 373
  10. 2022Text and Code Embeddings by Contrastive Pre-Trainingcited by 361
  11. 2017All-but-the-Top: Simple and Effective Postprocessing for Word Representationscited by 212
  12. 2014SimLex-999: Evaluating Semantic Models with (Genuine) Similarity Estimationcited by 172
  13. 2020Detecting Emergent Intersectional Biases: Contextualized Word Embeddings Contain a Distribution of Human-like Biasescited by 167
  14. 2021All Bark and No Bite: Rogue Dimensions in Transformer Language Models Obscure Representational Qualitycited by 156
  15. 2019The Bottom-up Evolution of Representations in the Transformer: A Study with Machine Translation and Language Modeling Objectivescited by 139
  16. 2021Evaluating CLIP: Towards Characterization of Broader Capabilities and Downstream Implicationscited by 128
  17. 2016Learning Visual N-Grams from Web Datacited by 95
  18. 2021Are Gender-Neutral Queries Really Gender-Neutral? Mitigating Gender Bias in Image Searchcited by 90
  19. 2016SimVerb-3500: A Large-Scale Evaluation Set of Verb Similaritycited by 44
  20. 2021Let's Play Mono-Poly: BERT Can Reveal Words' Polysemy Level and Partitionability into Sensescited by 39
  21. 2021Low Frequency Names Exhibit Bias and Overfitting in Contextualizing Language Modelscited by 39
  22. 2020ValNorm Quantifies Semantics to Reveal Consistent Valence Biases Across Languages and Over Centuriescited by 15
  23. 2016Correlation-based Intrinsic Evaluation of Word Vector Representationscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 4; 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: