mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ML-EAT: A Multilevel Embedding Association Test for Interpretable and Transparent Social Science

arXiv 2408.01966 ↗First posted 4 Aug 2024cs.CL cs.AI cs.CYcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This research introduces the Multilevel Embedding Association Test (ML-EAT), a method designed for interpretable and transparent measurement of intrinsic bias in language technologies. The ML-EAT addresses issues of ambiguity and difficulty in interpreting the traditional EAT measurement by quantifying bias at three levels of increasing granularity: the differential association between two target concepts with two attribute concepts; the individual effect size of each target concept with two attribute concepts; and the association between each individual target concept and each individual attribute concept. Using the ML-EAT, this research defines a taxonomy of EAT patterns describing the nine possible outcomes of an embedding association test, each of which is associated with a unique EAT-Map, a novel four-quadrant visualization for interpreting the ML-EAT. Empirical analysis of static and diachronic word embeddings, GPT-2 language models, and a CLIP language-and-image model shows that EAT patterns add otherwise unobservable information about the component biases that make up an EAT; reveal the effects of prompting in zero-shot models; and can also identify situations when cosine similarity is an ineffective metric, rendering an EAT unreliable. Our work contributes a method for rendering bias more observable and interpretable, improving the transparency of computational investigations into human minds and societies.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2024.

Builds on

27 of 69 references.

References · 27

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  4. 2022Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervisioncited by 3,972
  5. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,500
  6. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
  7. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
  8. 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 894
  9. 2019On Measuring Social Biases in Sentence Encoderscited by 397
  10. 2019Measuring Bias in Contextualized Word Representationscited by 275
  11. 2017Word Embeddings Quantify 100 Years of Gender and Ethnic Stereotypescited by 251
  12. 2023Exploring Large Language Models for Communication Games: An Empirical Study on Werewolfcited by 238
15 more
  1. 2017All-but-the-Top: Simple and Effective Postprocessing for Word Representationscited by 205
  2. 2021All Bark and No Bite: Rogue Dimensions in Transformer Language Models Obscure Representational Qualitycited by 150
  3. 2020Intrinsic Bias Metrics Do Not Correlate with Application Biascited by 148
  4. 2019Black is to Criminal as Caucasian is to Police: Detecting and Removing Multiclass Bias in Word Embeddingscited by 146
  5. 2020Image Representations Learned With Unsupervised Pre-Training Contain Human-like Biasescited by 107
  6. 2020Measuring Social Biases in Grounded Vision and Language Embeddingscited by 61
  7. 2019Understanding Undesirable Word Embedding Associationscited by 59
  8. 2022Contrastive Language-Vision AI Models Pretrained on Web-Scraped Multimodal Data Exhibit Sexual Objectification Biascited by 43
  9. 2022American == White in Multimodal Language-and-Image AIcited by 39
  10. 2022Evidence for Hypodescent in Visual Semantic AIcited by 30
  11. 2023Global Voices, Local Biases: Socio-Cultural Prejudices across Languagescited by 23
  12. 2023Evaluating Biased Attitude Associations of Language Models in an Intersectional Contextcited by 20
  13. 2022VAST: The Valence-Assessing Semantics Test for Contextualizing Language Modelscited by 10
  14. 2022Large scale analysis of gender bias and sexism in song lyricscited by 4
  15. 2023Disentangling Societal Inequality from Model Biases: Gender Inequality in Divorce Court Proceedingscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.