ML-EAT: A Multilevel Embedding Association Test for Interpretable and Transparent Social Science
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This research introduces the Multilevel Embedding Association Test (ML-EAT), a method designed for interpretable and transparent measurement of intrinsic bias in language technologies. The ML-EAT addresses issues of ambiguity and difficulty in interpreting the traditional EAT measurement by quantifying bias at three levels of increasing granularity: the differential association between two target concepts with two attribute concepts; the individual effect size of each target concept with two attribute concepts; and the association between each individual target concept and each individual attribute concept. Using the ML-EAT, this research defines a taxonomy of EAT patterns describing the nine possible outcomes of an embedding association test, each of which is associated with a unique EAT-Map, a novel four-quadrant visualization for interpreting the ML-EAT. Empirical analysis of static and diachronic word embeddings, GPT-2 language models, and a CLIP language-and-image model shows that EAT patterns add otherwise unobservable information about the component biases that make up an EAT; reveal the effects of prompting in zero-shot models; and can also identify situations when cosine similarity is an ineffective metric, rendering an EAT unreliable. Our work contributes a method for rendering bias more observable and interpretable, improving the transparency of computational investigations into human minds and societies.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2024.
Builds on
27 of 69 references.
References · 27
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
- 2022Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervisioncited by 3,972
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,500
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
- 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
- 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 894
- 2019On Measuring Social Biases in Sentence Encoderscited by 397
- 2019Measuring Bias in Contextualized Word Representationscited by 275
- 2017Word Embeddings Quantify 100 Years of Gender and Ethnic Stereotypescited by 251
- 2023Exploring Large Language Models for Communication Games: An Empirical Study on Werewolfcited by 238
15 more
- 2017All-but-the-Top: Simple and Effective Postprocessing for Word Representationscited by 205
- 2021All Bark and No Bite: Rogue Dimensions in Transformer Language Models Obscure Representational Qualitycited by 150
- 2020Intrinsic Bias Metrics Do Not Correlate with Application Biascited by 148
- 2019Black is to Criminal as Caucasian is to Police: Detecting and Removing Multiclass Bias in Word Embeddingscited by 146
- 2020Image Representations Learned With Unsupervised Pre-Training Contain Human-like Biasescited by 107
- 2020Measuring Social Biases in Grounded Vision and Language Embeddingscited by 61
- 2019Understanding Undesirable Word Embedding Associationscited by 59
- 2022Contrastive Language-Vision AI Models Pretrained on Web-Scraped Multimodal Data Exhibit Sexual Objectification Biascited by 43
- 2022American == White in Multimodal Language-and-Image AIcited by 39
- 2022Evidence for Hypodescent in Visual Semantic AIcited by 30
- 2023Global Voices, Local Biases: Socio-Cultural Prejudices across Languagescited by 23
- 2023Evaluating Biased Attitude Associations of Language Models in an Intersectional Contextcited by 20
- 2022VAST: The Valence-Assessing Semantics Test for Contextualizing Language Modelscited by 10
- 2022Large scale analysis of gender bias and sexism in song lyricscited by 4
- 2023Disentangling Societal Inequality from Model Biases: Gender Inequality in Divorce Court Proceedingscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.
- 2025Fragments to Facts: Partial-Information Fragment Inference from LLMscited by 0
- 2026RPAM: A Principled Metric for Evaluating Associations in Language Models with High Predictive Validity in Downstream Outputscited by 0
- 2026Calibrating WEAT Against Anisotropy: ZCA Whitening as a Geometric Pre-Processing Step for Embedding Association Testscited by 0
- 2026Calibrating WEAT Against Anisotropy: ZCA Whitening as a Geometric Pre-Processing Step for Embedding Association Tests7 Aug 2026
- 2026RPAM: A Principled Metric for Evaluating Associations in Language Models with High Predictive Validity in Downstream Outputs6 Jul 2026
- 2025Fragments to Facts: Partial-Information Fragment Inference from LLMs20 May 2025