Calibrating WEAT Against Anisotropy: ZCA Whitening as a Geometric Pre-Processing Step for Embedding Association Tests
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We propose Zero-phase Component Analysis (ZCA) whitening as a geometric pre-processing step for the Word Embedding Association Test (WEAT). WEAT is a bias measurement method widely used in both computational social science and AI fairness research. It relies on cosine similarity as a measure of semantic association, which assumes that the embedding space is approximately isotropic. However, prior work has reported that many widely used language models do not satisfy this assumption, raising concerns about the reliability of bias measurements. ZCA whitening transforms the covariance of the embedding space into the identity matrix while minimizing perturbation to the original vectors. This transformation restores the isotropy condition on which WEAT relies. We evaluate our approach on ten standard WEAT test suites and seven models spanning three architectural families, yielding 70 model-task combinations. The results show that ZCA whitening substantially reduces the anisotropy of the embedding spaces across all models. Particularly for highly anisotropic models, we further observe improvements on standard semantic similarity benchmarks, indicating that the calibrated space better captures semantic associations. After calibration, over 30% of WEAT results change significance status, and effect sizes shift in both directions depending on bias category. These shifts suggest that uncalibrated measurements may both overestimate and underestimate the associations encoded in the embedding space. These findings indicate that previously reported bias measurements in anisotropic embedding spaces should be interpreted with caution and may benefit from re-evaluation with calibrated methods. Our approach contributes to restoring the measurement foundation of WEAT across both computational social science and AI fairness research.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Aug 2026.
Builds on
29 of 58 references.
References · 29
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
- 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,312
- 2017SemEval-2017 Task 1: Semantic Textual Similarity - Multilingual and Cross-lingual Focused Evaluationcited by 1,001
- 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 956
- 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 901
- 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 784
- 2019On Measuring Social Biases in Sentence Encoderscited by 398
- 2019Measuring Bias in Contextualized Word Representationscited by 276
- 2017Word Embeddings Quantify 100 Years of Gender and Ethnic Stereotypescited by 253
- 2017All-but-the-Top: Simple and Effective Postprocessing for Word Representationscited by 212
17 more
- 2021Whitening Sentence Representations for Better Semantics and Faster Retrievalcited by 202
- 2014SimLex-999: Evaluating Semantic Models with (Genuine) Similarity Estimationcited by 172
- 2020Detecting Emergent Intersectional Biases: Contextualized Word Embeddings Contain a Distribution of Human-like Biasescited by 167
- 2021All Bark and No Bite: Rogue Dimensions in Transformer Language Models Obscure Representational Qualitycited by 156
- 2020Image Representations Learned With Unsupervised Pre-Training Contain Human-like Biasescited by 107
- 2015Optimal whitening and decorrelationcited by 97
- 2021WhiteningBERT: An Easy Unsupervised Sentence Embedding Approachcited by 69
- 2020Measuring Social Biases in Grounded Vision and Language Embeddingscited by 61
- 2023Bias Against 93 Stigmatized Groups in Masked Language Models and Downstream Sentiment Classification Taskscited by 51
- 2022Problems with Cosine as a Measure of Embedding Similarity for High Frequency Wordscited by 49
- 2022Evidence for Hypodescent in Visual Semantic AIcited by 30
- 2023On the Independence of Association Bias and Empirical Fairness in Language Modelscited by 29
- 2021An Isotropy Analysis in the Multilingual BERT Embedding Spacecited by 25
- 2025Rethinking LLM Bias Probing Using Lessons from the Social Sciencescited by 7
- 2023Disentangling Societal Inequality from Model Biases: Gender Inequality in Divorce Court Proceedingscited by 3
- 2024ML-EAT: A Multilevel Embedding Association Test for Interpretable and Transparent Social Sciencecited by 3
- 2026VEAT Quantifies Implicit Associations in Text-to-Video Generator Sora and Reveals Challenges in Bias Mitigationcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.