mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Trading Positional Complexity vs. Deepness in Coordinate Networks

arXiv 2205.08987 ↗First posted 18 May 2022cs.CVcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

It is well noted that coordinate-based MLPs benefit -- in terms of preserving high-frequency information -- through the encoding of coordinate positions as an array of Fourier features. Hitherto, the rationale for the effectiveness of these positional encodings has been mainly studied through a Fourier lens. In this paper, we strive to broaden this understanding by showing that alternative non-Fourier embedding functions can indeed be used for positional encoding. Moreover, we show that their performance is entirely determined by a trade-off between the stable rank of the embedded matrix and the distance preservation between embedded coordinates. We further establish that the now ubiquitous Fourier feature mapping of position is a special case that fulfills these conditions. Consequently, we present a more general theory to analyze positional encoding in terms of shifted basis functions. In addition, we argue that employing a more complex positional encoding -- that scales exponentially with the number of modes -- requires only a linear (rather than deep) coordinate function to achieve comparable performance. Counter-intuitively, we demonstrate that trading positional embedding complexity for network deepness is orders of magnitude faster than current state-of-the-art; despite the additional embedding complexity. To this end, we develop the necessary theoretical formulae and empirically verify that our theoretical claims hold in practice.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 May 2022.

Builds on

32 of 41 references.

References · 32

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  4. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  5. 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,801
  6. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
  7. 2020Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional Domainscited by 2,170
  8. 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,157
  9. 2021Mip-NeRF: A Multiscale Representation for Anti-Aliasing Neural Radiance Fieldscited by 1,957
  10. 2019Transformer-XL: Attentive Language Models Beyond a Fixed-Length Contextcited by 1,830
  11. 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,321
  12. 2020NeRF in the Wild: Neural Radiance Fields for Unconstrained Photo Collectionscited by 1,230
20 more
  1. 2018Self-Attention with Relative Position Representationscited by 1,112
  2. 2019Scene Representation Networks: Continuous 3D-Structure-Aware Neural Scene Representationscited by 864
  3. 2019PIFu: Pixel-Aligned Implicit Function for High-Resolution Clothed Human Digitizationcited by 818
  4. 2014Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Imagescited by 774
  5. 2020Neural Scene Flow Fields for Space-Time View Synthesis of Dynamic Scenescited by 750
  6. 2019Wide Neural Networks of Any Depth Evolve as Linear Models Under Gradient Descentcited by 732
  7. 2019Differentiable Volumetric Rendering: Learning Implicit 3D Representations without 3D Supervisioncited by 699
  8. 2018Gradient Descent Provably Optimizes Over-parameterized Neural Networkscited by 655
  9. 2019Fine-Grained Analysis of Optimization and Generalization for Overparameterized Two-Layer Neural Networkscited by 562
  10. 2017Convolutional Sequence to Sequence Learningcited by 550
  11. 2020Dynamic Neural Radiance Fields for Monocular 4D Facial Avatar Reconstructioncited by 465
  12. 2020Neural Scene Graphs for Dynamic Scenescited by 298
  13. 2020UniLMv2: Pseudo-Masked Language Models for Unified Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 204
  14. 2020Rethinking Positional Encoding in Language Pre-trainingcited by 197
  15. 2018Constituency Parsing with a Self-Attentive Encodercited by 196
  16. 2019On the Inductive Bias of Neural Tangent Kernelscited by 177
  17. 2017YouTube-BoundingBoxes: A Large High-Precision Human-Annotated Data Set for Object Detection in Videocited by 109
  18. 2020Learning to Encode Position for Transformer with Continuous Dynamical Modelcited by 61
  19. 2019Reconstructing continuous distributions of 3D protein structure from cryo-EM imagescited by 56
  20. 2019Encoding word order in complex embeddingscited by 53

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 7; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

16 papers.

Sort:

By area: