mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning Generalized Policies Without Supervision Using GNNs

arXiv 2205.06002 ↗First posted 12 May 2022cs.AI cs.LGcited by 22

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider the problem of learning generalized policies for classical planning domains using graph neural networks from small instances represented in lifted STRIPS. The problem has been considered before but the proposed neural architectures are complex and the results are often mixed. In this work, we use a simple and general GNN architecture and aim at obtaining crisp experimental results and a deeper understanding: either the policy greedy in the learned value function achieves close to 100% generalization over instances larger than those used in training, or the failure must be understood, and possibly fixed, logically. For this, we exploit the relation established between the expressive power of GNNs and the C2 fragment of first-order logic (namely, FOL with 2 variables and counting quantifiers). We find for example that domains with general policies that require more expressive features can be solved with GNNs once the states are extended with suitable "derived atoms" encoding role compositions and transitive closures that do not fit into C2. The work follows the GNN approach for learning optimal general policies in a supervised fashion (Stahlberg, Bonet, Geffner, 2022); but the learned policies are no longer required to be optimal (which expands the scope, as many planning domains do not have general optimal policies) and are learned without supervision. Interestingly, value-based reinforcement learning methods that aim to produce optimal policies, do not always yield policies that generalize, as the goals of optimality and generality are in conflict in domains where optimal planning is NP-hard.

Key facts. Cited by 22 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 May 2022.

Builds on

26 of 53 references.

References · 26

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
  4. 2018Weisfeiler and Leman Go Neural: Higher-order Graph Neural Networkscited by 878
  5. 2019Leveraging Procedural Generation to Benchmark Reinforcement Learningcited by 478
  6. 2018BabyAI: A Platform to Study the Sample Efficiency of Grounded Language Learningcited by 238
  7. 2018An Introduction to Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 201
  8. 2020The Surprising Power of Graph Neural Networks with Random Node Initializationcited by 190
  9. 2021Equivariant Subgraph Aggregation Networkscited by 154
  10. 2020Learning with AMIGo: Adversarially Motivated Intrinsic Goalscited by 86
  11. 2021The Logic of Graph Neural Networkscited by 84
  12. 2019Learning Domain-Independent Planning Heuristics with Hypergraph Networkscited by 50
14 more
  1. 2019Graph Neural Networks for Maximum Constraint Satisfactioncited by 46
  2. 2019ASNets: Deep Learning for Generalised Planningcited by 42
  3. 2017Learning Generalized Reactive Policies using Deep Neural Networkscited by 39
  4. 2019Learning First-Order Symbolic Representations for Planning from the Structure of the State Spacecited by 38
  5. 2021Learning General Optimal Policies with Graph Neural Networks: Expressive Power, Transparency, and Limitscited by 38
  6. 2018Learning Features and Abstract Actions for Computing Generalized Planscited by 35
  7. 2020Generalized Planning With Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 35
  8. 2018Features, Projections, and Representation Change for Generalized Planningcited by 25
  9. 2019Unsupervised Grounding of Plannable First-Order Logic Representation from Imagescited by 24
  10. 2021Learning First-Order Representations for Planning from Black-Box States: New Resultscited by 23
  11. 2020Learning Generalized Relational Heuristic Networks for Model-Agnostic Planningcited by 22
  12. 2019Qualitative Numeric Planning: Reductions and Complexitycited by 18
  13. 2019Generalized Planning With Procedural Domain Control Knowledgecited by 11
  14. 2021Expressing and Exploiting the Common Subgoal Structure of Classical Planning Domains Using Sketches: Extended Versioncited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 6; 2025: 7; 2026: 5.

22 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2023Learning Domain-Independent Heuristics for Grounded and Lifted Planningcited by 31
  2. 2025Classical Planning with LLM-Generated Heuristics: Challenging the State of the Art with Python Codecited by 18
  3. 2024Symmetries and Expressive Requirements for Learning General Policiescited by 7
  4. 2023Generalized Planning as Heuristic Search: A new planning search-space that leverages pointers over objectscited by 6
  5. 2025Symmetry-Aware Transformer Training for Automated Planningcited by 5
  6. 2022Hierarchical Decomposition and Analysis for Generalized Planningcited by 4
  7. 2025Leveraging Action Relational Structures for Integrated Learning and Planningcited by 4
  8. 2025First-Order Representation Languages for Goal-Conditioned RLcited by 4
  9. 2024Graph Neural Network Based Action Ranking for Planningcited by 3
  10. 2025Per-Domain Generalizing Policies: On Validation Instances and Scaling Behaviorcited by 3
  11. 2025Learning General Policies with Policy Gradient Methodscited by 3
  12. 2022Exploration Policies for On-the-Fly Controller Synthesis: A Reinforcement Learning Approachcited by 2
10 more
  1. 2024On Policy Reuse: An Expressive Language for Representing and Executing General Policies that Call Other Policiescited by 1
  2. 2024Learning Generalized Policies for Fully Observable Non-Deterministic Planning Domainscited by 1
  3. 2024Learning to Ground Existentially Quantified Goalscited by 1
  4. 2026On the Ability of Transformers to Verify Planscited by 1
  5. 2024Meta-operators for Enabling Parallel Planning Using Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
  6. 2025Learning General Policies From Examplescited by 0
  7. 2026On Sample-Efficient Generalized Planning via Learned Transition Modelscited by 0
  8. 2026Per-Domain Generalizing Policies: On Learning Efficient and Robust Q-Value Functions (Extended Version with Technical Appendix)cited by 0
  9. 2026Efficient Lookahead Encoding and Abstracted Width for Learning General Policies in Classical Planningcited by 0
  10. 2026Learning Admissible Heuristics via Cost Partitioningcited by 0