mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning First-Order Representations for Planning from Black-Box States: New Results

arXiv 2105.10830 ↗First posted 23 May 2021cs.AIcited by 23

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recently Bonet and Geffner have shown that first-order representations for planning domains can be learned from the structure of the state space without any prior knowledge about the action schemas or domain predicates. For this, the learning problem is formulated as the search for a simplest first-order domain description D that along with information about instances I_i (number of objects and initial state) determine state space graphs G(P_i) that match the observed state graphs G_i where P_i = (D, I_i). The search is cast and solved approximately by means of a SAT solver that is called over a large family of propositional theories that differ just in the parameters encoding the possible number of action schemas and domain predicates, their arities, and the number of objects. In this work, we push the limits of these learners by moving to an answer set programming (ASP) encoding using the CLINGO system. The new encodings are more transparent and concise, extending the range of possible models while facilitating their exploration. We show that the domains introduced by Bonet and Geffner can be solved more efficiently in the new approach, often optimally, and furthermore, that the approach can be easily extended to handle partial information about the state graphs as well as noise that prevents some states from being distinguished.

Key facts. Cited by 23 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 May 2021.

Builds on

18 of 43 references.

References · 18

  1. 2019Mastering Atari, Go, Chess and Shogi by Planning with a Learned Modelcited by 1,353
  2. 2018Learning Latent Dynamics for Planning from Pixelscited by 1,264
  3. 2020Mastering Atari with Discrete World Modelscited by 1,007
  4. 2018BabyAI: A Platform to Study the Sample Efficiency of Grounded Language Learningcited by 244
  5. 2018Deep Learning: A Critical Appraisalcited by 217
  6. 2017Multi-shot ASP solving with clingocited by 115
  7. 2018Theoretical Impediments to Machine Learning With Seven Sparks from the Causal Revolutioncited by 66
  8. 2017Learning Generalized Reactive Policies using Deep Neural Networkscited by 39
  9. 2019Learning First-Order Symbolic Representations for Planning from the Structure of the State Spacecited by 38
  10. 2018Combined Reinforcement Learning via Abstract Representationscited by 37
  11. 2018Learning Features and Abstract Actions for Computing Generalized Planscited by 35
  12. 2019An Explicitly Relational Neural Network Architecturecited by 35
6 more
  1. 2017Action Schema Networks: Generalised Policies with Deep Learningcited by 32
  2. 2019Unsupervised Grounding of Plannable First-Order Logic Representation from Imagescited by 24
  3. 2018Model-free, Model-based, and General Intelligencecited by 14
  4. 2018Transfer of Deep Reactive Policies for MDP Planningcited by 11
  5. 2017Human-Level Intelligence or Animal-Like Abilities?cited by 8
  6. 2021Learning General Policies from Small Examples Without Supervisioncited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 4; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 7; 2026: 5.

23 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Learning General Optimal Policies with Graph Neural Networks: Expressive Power, Transparency, and Limitscited by 38
  2. 2021Classical Planning in Deep Latent Spacecited by 22
  3. 2022Learning Generalized Policies Without Supervision Using GNNscited by 22
  4. 2024Learning Lifted STRIPS Models from Action Traces Alone: A Simple, General, and Scalable Solutioncited by 8
  5. 2022MACQ: A Holistic View of Model Acquisition Techniquescited by 7
  6. 2023Learning Logic Specifications for Soft Policy Guidance in POMCPcited by 7
  7. 2021Target Languages (vs. Inductive Biases) for Learning to Act and Plancited by 5
  8. 2025Online inductive learning from answer sets for efficient reinforcement learning explorationcited by 4
  9. 2025Neuro-Symbolic Imitation Learning: Discovering Symbolic Abstractions for Skill Learningcited by 4
  10. 2025Learning General Policies with Policy Gradient Methodscited by 3
  11. 2026Learning Lifted Action Models from Unsupervised Visual Tracescited by 3
  12. 2022Learning First-Order Symbolic Planning Representations That Are Groundedcited by 2
11 more
  1. 2023Learning Type-Generalized Actions for Symbolic Planningcited by 2
  2. 2025Learning Lifted Action Models From Traces of Incomplete Actions and Statescited by 2
  3. 2025Few-Shot Neuro-Symbolic Imitation Learning for Long-Horizon Planning and Actingcited by 2
  4. 2025From Next Token Prediction to (STRIPS) World Modelscited by 2
  5. 2026The Price Is Not Right: Neuro-Symbolic Methods Outperform VLAs on Structured Long-Horizon Manipulation Tasks with Significantly Lower Energy Consumptioncited by 1
  6. 2022Language-Based Causal Representation Learningcited by 0
  7. 2023Synthesis of Procedural Models for Deterministic Transition Systemscited by 0
  8. 2025Exploiting Symbolic Heuristics for the Synthesis of Domain-Specific Temporal Planning Guidance using Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
  9. 2026Build on Priors: Vision--Language--Guided Neuro-Symbolic Imitation Learning for Data-Efficient Real-World Robot Manipulationcited by 0
  10. 2026Differentiable Learning of Lifted Action Schemas for Classical Planningcited by 0
  11. 2026Learning Lifted Action Models from Traces with Minimal Information About Actions and Statescited by 0